38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court directs formation of committee to address deepfake concerns, sets three months deadline for report [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      26 November, 2024 03:59 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court directs formation of committee to address deepfake concerns sets three months deadline  for report

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has directed swift action on the regulation of deepfake technology while hearing petitions challenging the current framework for handling synthetic media.

Delhi HC Mandates Urgent Action on Deepfakes: Committee to Submit Report in 3 Months

Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela made important observations and issued specific directions after reviewing the government’s status report.

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) submitted its status report detailing various initiatives. The court noted: “The Ministry is funding a research project titled ‘Fake Speech Detection using Deep Learning Framework’ with a financial outlay of Rs. 47.846 lakhs, aimed at developing comprehensive detection systems.”

Government, Tech Experts, and Victims to Collaborate on Tackling Deepfake Challenges

Addressing ongoing developments, MEITY informed the court: “The Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) has developed ‘FakeCheck,’ a desktop application for offline deepfake detection, which is currently being tested by law enforcement agencies.”

The court emphasized the urgency of addressing deepfake concerns, stating: “Every day’s delay in creation, detection, and removal of deepfakes is causing immense hardship to the public at large.”

Issuing specific directions, the court mandated that “the Union of India name the nominees to the Committee relating to the issue of deepfakes within a week.” The court further directed that the Committee “examine and take into consideration the suggestions filed by the petitioners” and study regulations from other jurisdictions, particularly the European Union.

The court also ordered the Committee to “invite and hear the experiences and suggestions of stakeholders like the intermediary platforms, telecommunication service providers, victims of deepfakes, and websites which provide and deploy deepfakes before submitting its report.”

Setting a clear timeline, the court directed the Committee to submit its report “preferably within three months.”

Mr. Manohar Lal appeared with petitioner Chaitanya Rohilla, while Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Senior Advocate, represented Rajat Sharma. Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG, with Mr. Apoorv Kurup, appeared for the Union of India.

Case title: Chaitanya Rohilla & Rajat Sharma v. Union of India

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-sets-aside-ngt-order-for-temple-demolition-holds-tribunal-has-no-jurisdiction-over-encroachments-under-municipal-laws
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside NGT Order for Temple Demolition; Holds Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction Over Encroachments Under Municipal Laws [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside NGT order to demolish Ghaziabad temple, ruling tribunal lacks jurisdiction over encroachments under municipal laws.

18 March, 2026 10:41 AM
meghalaya-hc-quashes-ghadc-order-making-st-certificate-mandatory-for-election-nominations
Trending Judiciary
Meghalaya HC Quashes GHADC Order Making ST Certificate Mandatory for Election Nominations [Read Order]

Meghalaya HC quashes GHADC notification mandating ST certificate for poll nominations, cites lack of Governor approval and due process.

18 March, 2026 03:51 PM
ignorance-of-law-no-defence-in-child-marriage-cases-subsequent-marital-harmony-cannot-erase-criminal-liability-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
Ignorance of Law No Defence in Child Marriage Cases; Subsequent Marital Harmony Cannot Erase Criminal Liability: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka HC rules ignorance of law no defence in child marriage cases; says later marital harmony cannot erase criminal liability under law.

18 March, 2026 04:41 PM
section-319-crpc-stage-is-not-a-mini-trial-trial-courts-cannot-apply-proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt-standard-sc
Trending Judiciary
Section 319 CrPC Stage Is Not a Mini Trial; Trial Courts Cannot Apply ‘Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Standard: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules Section 319 CrPC stage is not a mini trial; courts cannot apply proof beyond reasonable doubt while summoning additional accused.

18 March, 2026 04:51 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email