38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Issues Fresh Notice to BBC in Rs 10,000 Cr Defamation Suit Over 'India: The Modi Question' Documentary

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      26 September, 2023 05:29 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Issues Fresh Notice to BBC in Rs  Cr Defamation Suit Over India The Modi Question Documentary

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has issued a fresh notice to the BBC on a defamation suit filed by an Ahmedabad-based trust seeking Rs 10,000 Cr damages for its two parts documentary India: The Modi Question for allegedly casting slur on India's reputation and its Prime Minister and the judiciary.

A bench of Justice Sachin Datta sought a response from the public broadcaster of the United Kingdom on a suit filed by NGO 'Justice on Trial', claiming "false and scurrilous allegations that are aired do not even have a fig leaf of journalistic neutrality and reporting of facts."

On September 25, the court was informed by the NGO's counsel that the notice issued earlier in May could not be served upon the respondents.

The court, after issuing the notice, put the matter for hearing on December 15, 2023.

The NGO claimed "false and scurrilous allegations which were aired do not even have a fig leaf of journalistic neutrality and reporting of facts."

The plaintiff contended that the conduct of the respondents is actionable and has made them liable to damages. It said the whole system, the Constitutional network, including Indias judicial system, has been defamed.

The two part documentary were aired on January 17 and 24, 2023. "These videos remain accessible on the internet notwithstanding the blocking orders issued by the Government of India and are in fact being accessed across the territory of India even on the present date and are being published and republished on a continuing basis and have not been withdrawn," it claimed.

The plaintiff contended that the said documentary/publication contained content which casts a slur on the reputation of the country and also made false and defamatory imputations and insinuations against the Prime Minister of India, the Indian Judiciary and the Indian criminal justice system.

Among others, plea said, the first part carried an interview of a UK citizen of Indian origin, claiming the impression sought to be conveyed is that British citizens cannot not get justice in India and that the judicial system of the country is "corrupt, majoritarian, and broken".

It contended the governmental and judicial response to the 2002 riots has been to ensure that the rule of law has been brought to bear on all persons involved, regardless of their status or position.

However, "the documentary does not even attempt to present these facts in an objective manner. Rather, the intent and purpose appears to be only to revive and repackage allegations that have not withstood judicial scrutiny and present these half-truths and outright falsehoods as irrefutable fact," it claimed.

In the case of 2002 riots, the Supreme Court entertained petitions and took upon itself to see that a free and fair investigation was conducted under an independent SIT whose officers were appointed by judicial orders and whose functioning was closely overseen by the top court itself, the plea stated.

On January 21, 2023, the Centre had invoked rule 16 of IT rule 2021 and prohibited citizen of India from watching BBC documentary related to Gujarat riots of 2002. The government has contended the documentary was a "propaganda piece designed to push a discredited narrative" and a reflection of the colonial mindset.

The plaintiff moved the HC in a suit for damages, under Order 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) seeking permission to file as an indigent person.

The HC order had recorded that 'Justice For All' is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and is also registered as a public trust under the provisions of the Bombay Public Trust.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-allows-manufacturing-of-green-crackers-in-delhi-subject-to-no-sale
Trending Judiciary
SC allows manufacturing of green crackers in Delhi, subject to no sale

SC allows certified manufacturers to produce green crackers in Delhi, but bans their sale in NCR till further orders, balancing pollution and livelihoods.

27 September, 2025 01:23 AM
kerala-hc-directs-comprehensive-snakebite-prevention-guidelines-for-schools
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Directs Comprehensive Snakebite Prevention Guidelines For Schools [Read Order]

Kerala High Court directs comprehensive snakebite prevention and management guidelines for schools, ensuring safety, awareness, and emergency response.

30 September, 2025 08:46 PM
sc-orders-two-judicial-officers-to-go-for-seven-days-training-for-flawed-bail-order
Trending Judiciary
SC orders two judicial officers to go for seven days training for flawed bail order [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes flawed bail order, directs two Delhi judges to undergo 7-day special training on judicial conduct and bail rulings.

30 September, 2025 09:58 PM
sc-seeks-reply-from-iit-delhi-kharagpur-on-plea-to-transfer-student-due-to-mental-health-condition
Trending Judiciary
SC seeks reply from IIT Delhi, Kharagpur on plea to transfer student due to mental health condition [Read Order]

SC seeks reply from IIT Delhi & Kharagpur on plea for transfer of B Arch student citing mental health needs, AIIMS proximity & Article 21 rights.

30 September, 2025 11:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email