38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court protects Unnao rape survivor from coercive action in DOB forgery case [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      27 December, 2022 08:12 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court protects Unnao rape survivor from coercive action in DOB forgery case

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has directed that no "precipitate action" should be taken by the trial court against Unnao rape survivor in an FIR, alleging that the victim and her mother had illegally forged the date on her birth certificate in order to invoke offences under POCSO Act.

In an order passed on December 19, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani said, "no precipitate action affecting the petitioner's (Victim's) liberty shall be taken by the trial court, till the next date of hearing."

The court listed her plea for protection against arrest for further hearing on March 1, 2023.

The court also issued notice to the police and sought its reply within six weeks on the anticipatory bail plea moved by the victim.

It noted the petitioner, who is a young girl, about 21 years of age, sought anticipatory bail under section 438 CrPC in the FIR lodged on December 23, 2018 registered under sections 419/420/467/468/471 IPC
at PS Makhi, UP.

She first filed the anticipatory bail application before the Allahabad High Court. However, it was withdrawn on December 16.

According to the prosecution, the Unnao rape survivor, a minor, was kidnapped and raped by former BJP MLA, Kuldeep Singh Sengar between June 11, 2017, to June 20, 2017, and other of his accomplices.

In August 2019, the Supreme Court transferred the trial in four cases relating to the Unnao rape case to Delhi's Saket court. It had also ordered that the trial should be held on a day-to-day basis and completed within 45 days.

The trial court had on December 16, 2019 found Sengar guilty of raping the minor girl and on December 20, 2019 sentenced him to 'life imprisonment till the remainder of his biological life'.

Read Order



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email