38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court quashes FIR in SC/ST Act case, warns against misuse of welfare legislations [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      29 January, 2025 06:10 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court quashes FIR in SC ST Act case warns against misuse of welfare legislations

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR and the subsequent proceedings under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, emphasizing that welfare legislation should not be misused for ulterior motives.

Delhi High Court Ruling on SC/ST Act: A Landmark Judgment Against Misuse

Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma delivered the judgment in petitions seeking to quash FIR No. 04/2007 registered at Sarojini Nagar Police Station and related proceedings, including a summoning order from December 2010.

The case involved allegations by Dr. Yadu Lal against senior doctors Dr. A.K. Singh, Dr. Manoj Kumar, and Dr. Deepak Chaudhary of the Central Institute of Orthopaedics at Safdarjung Hospital. The complainant alleged caste-based discrimination and harassment affecting his professional standing.

SC/ST Act Misuse: Delhi HC Emphasizes Fair Implementation in Caste-Based Cases

The court observed that the dispute stemmed from a December 2003 order restricting the handling of arthroscopic equipment to specific doctors. This led to a series of complaints, investigations, and committee formations spanning two decades.

Justice Sharma noted, “The courts must be cautious that such legislation, which is enacted with social welfare in mind, should not be misused. Such legislation should be implemented with purity and for the right purpose, ruling out any misuse for ulterior motives.”

The court found that multiple inquiry committees, including one headed by AIIMS doctors, had identified deficiencies in Dr. Lal’s professional conduct. The National Commission for Scheduled Castes had previously dismissed similar allegations of caste-based discrimination.

In its analysis, the court determined that the complaint failed to establish the essential elements required under Section 3(1)(ix) of the SC/ST Act. The court concluded that the proceedings appeared “to be rooted in professional rivalry rather than caste-based victimization.”

Senior Advocate Ravi Sikri and Advocate Ashok Arora appeared for the petitioners, while Advocate T.R. Naval represented Dr. Yadu Lal. The State was represented by APP Pradeep Gahalot.

Case Title: Deepak Chaudhary & Ors vs State & Anr

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email