38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Using Recycled Bottles Of Another Manufacturer Results In Infringement & Passing Off: Delhi High Court Rules In Favour Of 'BUDWEISER'

By LawStreet News Network      24 March, 2022 02:36 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Rules In Favour Of BUDWEISER

The owner of the trademarks 'BLACK FORT' and 'POWER COOL' has been barred from making or distributing beer under the name 'BUDWEISER' in recycled bottles or in any other manner, according to the Delhi High Court.

Justice Pratibha M Singh ruled in favour of Anheuser-Busch LLC, the owner of the trademark 'BUDWEISER,' believing that the Defendant Company's use of recycled 'BUDWEISER' beer bottles for products sold under the marks 'BLACK FORT' and 'POWER COOL' would clearly constitute 'use in the course of trade.'

It went on to say that the fact that the bottles were recycled made no difference when it came to the issue of infringement or passing off.

"Thus, the sale of any product with the recycled bottles of another manufacturer would result in infringement and passing off. Though the bottle itself may be a genuine bottle which may have been put by the plaintiff originally in the market, after the contents are consumed and the bottle reaches the recycling cycle, the Defendant's use of such bottles which have the plaintiff's trade mark embossed on them would cause confusion as to its source," the Court noted.

As a result, the Court ordered the Defendants to ensure that the recycled 'BUDWEISER' bottles are not used for their beer, which they manufacture and sell under the trademarks 'BLACK FORT' and 'POWER COOL,' or any other mark.

The Court further ordered that a higher level of supervision be exercised at the Defendant Company's production facility, as well as random checks and inspections, to guarantee that the bottles used in its manufacturing plant do not contain the mark 'BUDWEISER' in any way.

"With the acceptance of undertakings and the statements given by the Defendants, it is directed that the Defendants shall, henceforth, stand restrained from using, manufacturing or selling the mark 'BUDWEISER', even in recycled bottles, or in any manner whatsoever, in respect of beer manufactured an d sold by the Defendants," the Court ordered.

The Plaintiff has filed a lawsuit seeking a permanent injunction prohibiting the Defendants from using any glass bottles with the embossed word "Budweiser" on them.

The Defendants, on the other hand, were willing to issue an undertaking that the bottles of 'BUDWEISER' would not be used to manufacture and sell their own beer.

As a result of the Defendants' undertakings, the plaintiff agreed not to pursue the relief of damages, rendition of profits accounts, or delivering up.

However, the Court stated that in the future, if the plaintiff discovers any 'BUDWEISER' bottles coming from the Defendants' factory, the plaintiff must immediately notify the Defendants, who must take immediate remedial action, failing which, the plaintiff will be entitled to all of its legal remedies, including a claim for damages.

Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of paragraph 47 (i) to (iii) of the plaint. Decree sheet be drawn. The contents of the affidavit set out above, shall form part and parcel of the decree,  the Court Ordered.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email