38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi Riots: Delhi High Court Says No Hearing Till 20th March In Delhi Violence Cases

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      14 March, 2020 12:03 PM      0 Comments
Delhi Riots: Delhi High Court Says No Hearing Till 20th March In Delhi Violence Cases

The Delhi high court on Thursday (March 12, 2020) adjourned till March 20, 2020, hearing on a batch of petitions pertaining to Delhi riots. The division bench comprising Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Hari Shankar will hear all the pleas and impleadment applications pertaining to Delhi riots on March 20, 2020. 

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, sought more time to modify the replies. The court granted him time for the same. The court also sought response from Delhi government and Commissioner of Police on a separate plea seeking action against Sonia Gandhi, Waris Pathan, Kapil Mishra and other politicians for allegedly making hate speeches.

The plea further sought constitution of a SIT and computation of the damage caused to the public property and then to attach and sell the properties of Waris Pathan, Sonia Gandhi, Kapil Mishra, Salman Khurshid and other concerned parties in the plea to disburse the amount to the victims affected by the riots in the interest of justice. 

One of the petitions sought directions from the court, including immediate filing of FIRs against Mishra, Thakur, Verma and others for alleged hate speech, rioting, murder and arson. Another petition sought medical and humanitarian intervention for the victims and those displaced due to the riots in the northeastern part of Delhi.

The violence broke out in the north east parts of Delhi when two groups opposing and supporting the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) clashed with each other in areas like Seelampur, Maujpur, ChandBagh and Jaffrabad where the protestors torched houses and shops in the local vicinity. Over 40 people lost their lives in this horrific incident. And over 200 people incurred severe injuries. 

Author: Aishwary Bajpai



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
magistrates-power-to-order-probe-under-section-156-3-crpc-cannot-be-invalidated-for-mere-technical-errors-sc
Trending Judiciary
Magistrate’s Power to Order Probe Under Section 156(3) CrPC Cannot Be Invalidated for Mere Technical Errors: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a Magistrate’s order under Section 156(3) CrPC cannot be nullified for minor technical or linguistic errors if offences are made out.

07 November, 2025 05:05 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email