38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi State Commission Awards 25 Lakhs Damages To Woman For Medical Negligence [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      06 June, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Delhi State Commission Awards 25 Lakhs Damages To Woman For Medical Negligence [Read Judgment]

The Delhi State Consumer Forum on May 27, 2019, in the case of Swapnil Mishra v. Pushpanjali Healthcare, has awarded a sum of 25 lakhs to a woman, who lost her unborn baby, after a local hospital wrongly advised her to plan their first baby simultaneously with TB medicines.

The 28-year-old Swapnil Mishras ordeal did not end at the first hospital, as another hospital in Delhi left a portion of the dead fetus in the womb, following an operation, forcing her to undergo re-surgery resulting in further medical complications.

After complaining of heavy pain during her period, Ms. Mishra went to Pushpanjali Healthcare in Vaishali, Ghaziabad in November 2011 for a medical check-up. There, she was referred to Dr. Sharda Jain, who advised her to undergo a battery of tests including Pathogen Assisted Molecular Pattern (PAMP).

The result of the tests shocked her as Dr. Jain declared her to be suffering from edometrium Tuberculosis.

Despite the diagnosis and heavy medicine, Dr. Jain advised her to immediately plan their first baby, even while taking medication for TB, as otherwise it would be too late for them.

After pregnancy, the woman suffered complications and after conducting some tests with other doctors, they found that the growth of her baby was not proper. She then went to Fortis Le Femme Centre for Women at Greater Kailash, where she was referred to Dr. Neena Singh.

Dr. Singh advised the complainant to wait for 15 days to watch the progress of the baby and advised the ultrasound test. After 15 days, the ultrasound report declared the baby was lost. The doctor advised her to go for D&C (Dilation and curettage).

Within some days after D&C, complainant experienced very severe pain in her lower abdomen and on checking with the family physician who advised ultrasound test, it was revealed that operation of D&C was not done properly and that part of pregnancy admeasuring around 618mm was still left inside the body.

Dr. Singh apologised for her blunder and offered to do another D&C free of cost, during which she scratched the uterus so extensively that it damaged the wall of the endometium causing the very rare disease known as Ashmerman Syndrome. The disease is capable of terminating the chances of fertility and may shatter the dream of a lady to become a mother.

The couple had to run from pillar to post for over two years to get a competent doctor to enable her to conceive again.

The woman then moved the consumer forum for compensation.

Judicial member O.P. Gupta while passing the order noted that a doctor cannot be allowed to misguide the patient just for earning money. He said that a doctor is also not expected to make the patient scared and advise unnecessary costly tests.

The test conducted on complainant for ascertaining TB was banned, conception during TB is not desirable. Despite that she was advised to plan for baby immediately, he said.

Further, he also said that The act and conduct of OP-4 (Dr. Singh) in doing the D&C a second time to remove the left out part is highly condemnable. In the process she scratched the uterus so extensively that it damaged the wall of the endometium causing the very rare disease known as Asherman Syndrome that led to serious problems to the complainant.

Thus, the consumer court held the hospitals and doctors guilty of medical negligence and deficiency in service and awarded compensation of 25 lakhs to the woman. However, it declined the plea to initiate penal action against erring doctors and hospitals.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM
cash-debt-exceeding-20000-does-not-invalidate-cheque-dishonour-cases-under-section-138-of-the-ni-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Cash Debt Exceeding ₹20,000 Does Not Invalidate Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 138 of the NI Act: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that cash loans above ₹20,000 do not invalidate cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the NI Act despite I-T Act violations.

14 December, 2025 02:23 AM
sc-upholds-10-year-sentence-for-woman-in-commercial-quantity-ganja-case-rejects-pleas-based-on-sampling-irregularities
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds 10-Year Sentence for Woman in Commercial Quantity Ganja Case, Rejects Pleas Based on Sampling Irregularities [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds 10-year sentence under NDPS Act in commercial ganja case, ruling that sampling irregularities alone do not vitiate prosecution.

14 December, 2025 02:30 AM
sc-upholds-bail-in-2010-jnaneswari-express-derailment-case-issues-directions-on-speedy-trials-under-uapa
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Bail in 2010 Jnaneswari Express Derailment Case, Issues Directions on Speedy Trials Under UAPA [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds bail in the 2010 Jnaneswari Express derailment case while issuing sweeping directions to ensure speedy trials in UAPA cases.

14 December, 2025 02:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email