38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Doctors Should Regard the Call for Service to be Rendered as a Call for Joining 'National Duty' amid pandemic : Bombay HC [READ ORDER]

By Twinkle Agarwal      13 October, 2020 07:59 PM      0 Comments
Doctors Should Regard the Call for Service to be Rendered as a Call for Joining 'National Duty' amid pandemic : Bombay HC [READ ORDER]

On the behalf of 92 other doctors, three doctors filed a writ petition on the list which provided placements to the successful doctors who successfully completed the postgraduate medical courses of study. There was an executed bond that such doctors would serve the State of Maharashtra for 1 year. But after their studies on September 23, 2020, a list was published which was prepared randomly without any reason and ignoring the merits of candidates.

Thus, in the petition, they stated that such a list should be set, aside and the candidate should be selected on the basis of excellence and an interim relief should be granted. 

The Bombay High Court comprising the Bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni held that grant of interim relief will cause more prejudice than a refusal to grant relief. The petitioners and the others should regard the call for service to be rendered as a call for joining national duty so as to help the needy people by providing them adequate medical treatment in this difficult time of the pandemic.

They also held that the refusal does not mean the petition is pointless. Instead, it deserves fast consideration and disposal. The petitioners should consider the situation and file a reply-affidavit till October 13, 2020, to report for duty.

The court, therefore, refused to grant relief.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email