38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

EC moves SC against Madras HC's observation holding poll panel responsible for a spike in COVID-19 cases in the region

By Shreyas Nair      03 May, 2021 04:40 PM      0 Comments
EC moves SC against Madras HC

On Saturday (May 1, 2021), the Election Commission (EC) filed a petition with the Supreme Court, challenging the Madras High Court's findings that the poll panel was responsible for a spike in COVID-19 cases in the region.

According to the Madras High Court, the liable EC officials should be tried for murder for failing to ensure obedience to COVID-19 protocols during the election process in four states and a Union Territory.

A bench led by Justice D Y Chandrachud will hear the poll panel's appeal against the high court's failure to hear its petition opposing the critical remarks on May 3, 2021. "We have lodged an appeal against the orders of the high court."," the counsel for the EC, Amit Sharma, told the media. 

The EC, in its appeal in the apex court, said the high court's remarks were "uncalled for, blatantly disparaging and derogatory".

On (April 26, 2021), the high court's division bench made the stinging observation in response to a petition filed by Tamil Nadu's Transport Minister M R Vijayabaskar, who ran as the AIADMK candidate for Karur in the April 6 Assembly elections, seeking a direction to the authorities concerned to ensure a fair counting of votes on May 2 in his constituency by taking effective steps and making proper arrangements. It will be extremely difficult to fit their agents in the counting hall with 77 candidates in the race in Karur. The petitioner claimed that it may have an effect on procedure observance.

As the EC's counsel assured the judges that all possible measures were being taken, the bench retorted that the commission had opened the way for a revival of the deadly virus by encouraging political parties to hold rallies and organise meetings. When asked about the EC's counsel's assertion that all precautionary steps must be taken at the counting centres, the chief justice responded that the poll panel must be kept "singularly" accountable for the country's sudden increase in coronavirus cases.

The bench also suggested that EC officials might be charged with murder.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email