38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, April 26, 2024
Judiciary

Employee Has No Locus To Withdraw Notice Of Voluntary Retirement After It Is Accepted: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      03 May, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Employee Has No Locus To Withdraw Notice Of Voluntary Retirement After It Is Accepted: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]

The Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court on April 26, 2019, in the case of Gajanan v. Union of India and Others, has held that an employee cannot withdraw notice of voluntary retirement once it is accepted as the relationship between an employer and an employee comes to an end.

A Division Bench comprising of Justices S.V. Gangapurwala and A.M. Dhavale was hearing a writ petition filed by one Gajanan Maitri, Class II (Group-B) Income Tax Officer, Ward-Osmanabad Camp at Latur.

In this case, the petitioner, after rendering 35 years of service, on November 20, 2017, gave a notice/application for voluntary retirement from the post of Income Tax Officer. As per the notice of voluntary retirement, the petitioner intended to retire with effect from February 28, 2018. Later, on March 17, 2018, the petitioner gave an application for withdrawal of notice of voluntary retirement. However, the petitioner was informed that the application for voluntary retirement had been accepted on March 9, 2018.

Petitioner then challenged the said communication which rejected his application for withdrawal of notice of voluntary retirement before the Administrative Tribunal. The tribunal rejected the said application which led the petitioner to move the High Court.

Advocate S.P. Warad, appearing for the petitioner submitted before the court that the application withdrawing the notice of voluntary retirement was given before the acceptance of the notice of voluntary retirement, hence the notice of voluntary retirement would stand withdrawn. The petitioner has every right to withdraw the notice of voluntary retirement before its acceptance, Warad said.

He further argued that the tribunal failed to consider the said aspect in its correct perspective. Only 35 months of the service period of the petitioner had remained.

Additional Solicitor General S.B. Deshpande, appearing for the Union relied on Rule 48(1) of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, and submitted that the Rule does not permit the petitioner to withdraw the notice after acceptance of the notice of voluntary retirement and after the intended period of retirement is mentioned in the notice.

After hearing the submission made by both the parties, the court said that "The government employee will have locus poenitentiae to withdraw his request for voluntary retirement before the intended date of retirement and not thereafter. On the lapse of intended date of retirement, the relationship of the employer and employee would come to an end.

In the present case, the employer has accepted the notice of voluntary retirement on March 9, 2018 and had also issued an office order relieving the petitioner from service and for the first time the petitioner issued a letter withdrawing his notice of voluntary retirement on March 17, 2018. On the said date, the petitioner did not have locus to withdraw his notice of voluntary retirement as the relationship of an employer and employee came to an end."

Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition by holding that the tribunal had not committed any error in rejecting the petitioner's application.

[Read Judgment]

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

plea-in-sc-seeks-sit-probe-into-electoral-bonds-scam
Trending Judiciary
Plea in SC seeks SIT probe into 'Electoral Bonds scam'

NGOs seek SC probe into Electoral Bonds, alleging pay-offs and quid pro quo between corporates and governments, demanding an SIT to investigate and recover proceeds of crime.

25 April, 2024 10:50 AM
cant-control-elections-or-issue-directions-on-suspicion-sc
Trending Judiciary
Can't control elections or issue directions on suspicion: SC

Supreme Court says it cannot control elections or be an authority over the Election Commission, deferring a judgement on 100% VVPAT counts.

25 April, 2024 11:48 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-medical-examination-of-yr-old-rape-survivor-seeking-to-terminate-her-week-pregnancy
Trending Judiciary
SC orders medical examination of 14-yr-old rape survivor seeking to terminate her 28-week pregnancy

Supreme Court orders medical examination of 14-year-old rape survivor seeking termination of 28-week pregnancy. Decision to be made after evaluating impact on her health.

20 April, 2024 11:00 AM
a-critique-of-the-supreme-courts-adventurism-for-lgbtqia-rights
Trending Legal Insiders
Overreaching Jurisdiction: A critique of the Supreme Court's adventurism for LGBTQIA rights

In its over-enthusiasm to protect LGBTQIA+ rights, has the Supreme Court exceeded its constitutional mandate under Article 142? A Delhi University research scholar evaluates the theme.

22 April, 2024 10:48 AM
new-criminal-laws-watershed-moment-for-society-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
New criminal laws watershed moment for society: CJI [Read Inaugural Remarks]

CJI Chandrachud hails new criminal laws as a watershed moment, marking a significant overhaul for the justice system, emphasizing adaptation and technology's role.

22 April, 2024 11:26 AM
sc-grants-permission-for-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-of-14-yr-old-rape-survivor
Trending Judiciary
SC grants permission for medical termination of pregnancy of 14-yr-old rape survivor

Supreme Court grants medical termination of pregnancy to 14-yr-old rape survivor after assessing adverse health impacts, setting aside Bombay HC's decision.

22 April, 2024 12:14 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email