38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Give us categorical, unconditional undertaking against use of Sharad Pawar's photo, SC to Ajit Pawar group

By Jhanak Sharma      15 March, 2024 04:12 PM      0 Comments
Give us categorical unconditional undertaking against use of Sharad Pawars photo SC to Ajit Pawar group

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Ajit Pawar group of Nationalist Congress Party to give a categorical and unconditional undertaking against use of Sharad Pawar's photo in impending Lok Sabha polls.

The court asked Ajit Pawar group as to why it was desirous to use photo of Sharad Pawar in posters  after parting ways with the founder of the party.

"We need categorical, unconditional undertaking that name, pictures of Sharad Pawar will not be used," a bench of Justices Surya Kant and K V Vishwanathan told the Ajit Pawar faction.

Also Read -  SC notice to Ajit Pawar group on Sharad Pawar's plea on allotment of NCP name and symbol

"Go with your identity. You can't encash his name. When elections comes, you need his name but when it is over, you don't need him," the bench told senior advocate Maninder Singh appearing for the Ajit Pawar group.

The court asked Singh to give an undertaking that his faction would not use picture of Sharad Pawar group in the publicity materials during the Lok Sabha or Assembly polls.

The bench said the top court has yet not formed its view on the Election Commission's decision to recognise the Ajit Pawar group as real NCP with clock symbol.

Also Read - SC gives more Speaker to decide disqualification plea against Maharashtra Dy CM Ajit Pawar & other MLAs by Feb 15

Senior advocate A M Singhvi, appearing for the Sharad Pawar group, asked why Ajit Pawar group wanted to ride piggyback on Sharad Pawar group.

There are issues of free and fair elections, level playing field, democracy, which are the basic structure of the Constitution, he said.

Singhvi cited statement of Chhagan Bhujbal about use of picture of Sharad Pawar during campaign in rural areas, saying this is blatant deception. "If they are so confident of winning elections, let them do that on their own," he said.

"Why are you using his picture?

Give us an undertaking or we will pass an order. Go with your identity only. You have separated yourself," the bench told Singh.

The court said both the factions should come out with their own identity.

The court asked Singh to give an undertaking on Saturday in this regard as it posted the matter for hearing on March 18.

Sharad Pawar has earlier challenged the Election Commission's decision of February 6, recognising the group by Ajit Pawar as the NCP and awarding it party symbol of 'Clock'.

Sharad Pawar is uncle of Ajit Pawar and has founded the NCP.

Ajit Pawar and eight other legislators of the NCP joined Maharashtras ruling coalition of Eknath Shinde's Shiv Sena and BJP in July, 2023. 
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email