38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Godhra train burning case: SC rejects plea by convicts for hearing before 3-judge bench

By Harshvardhan Sharma      07 May, 2025 03:17 PM      0 Comments
Godhra train burning case SC rejects plea by convicts for hearing before 3 judge bench

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has rejected a plea by a few convicts that a two-judge bench cannot hear their appeals against conviction, as the matter involved the death penalty to 11 accused in the 2002 Godhra train burning case.

A bench of Justices J K Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar told the counsel that the rule and the apex court judgment did not bar hearing of the appeals in the present case by a two-judge bench, and commenced the final hearing in the matter.

The matter was related to on February 27, 2002 incident wherein, 59 people were killed as the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express was burnt by the convicts at Gujarat's Godhra, triggering riots in the state.

When the matter came up for hearing, senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, representing two convicts in the case, referred to the Red Fort terror attack case.

The counsel submitted that Mohammad Arif alias Ashfaq was sentenced to death in the Red Fort terror attack case and in that case, it was held that a three-judge bench has to hear cases pertaining to capital punishment.

Also Read: 'Godhra train burning,' SC to start final hearing on pleas of Guj & convicts on May 6 & 7

The bench, however, said, in the present case, the Gujarat High Court commuted the death penalty of 11 convicts to life imprisonment and did not award the death penalty. The trial court had awarded the death penalty in this case.

In a judgment delivered in September 2014 in the Red Fort case, a constitution bench of the apex court had ruled that in all cases in which a death sentence was awarded by the high court, such matters be listed before a bench of three judges.

Hegde contended that if a two-judge bench were to hand down the death penalty to some accused in the matter, then it has to be re-argued before another bench of three judges.

The bench made it clear that it is not inclined to accept this contention.

Citing relevant Supreme Court rules and the judgment, the bench said a three-judge bench has to hear appeals in cases where the high courts have either confirmed the death penalty or awarded it after hearing the appeals of parties. “The objection is repelled,” the bench said.

In April, the court had indicated that it would begin the final hearing in the matter on May 6 and May 7. The hearing will be on the appeals filed by the Gujarat government and several other convicts in the 2002 Godhra train burning case.

Several appeals have been filed against the October 2017 verdict of the Gujarat High Court. The high court had upheld the conviction of several convicts and commuted the death penalties of 11 people to life terms. Several convicts have challenged the high court's decision to uphold their convictions in the case. The state government has moved the apex court against the commutation of the death penalty to life term for the 11 convicts.
 



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

accused-need-not-appear-on-every-date-after-bail-in-appeals-sc
Trending Judiciary
Accused Need Not Appear on Every Date After Bail in Appeals: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules accused on bail after suspension of sentence need not appear on every hearing date in appellate or revisional courts.

19 January, 2026 12:47 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-press-councils-rejection-of-editors-guilds-claim-in-15th-press-council-constitution
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Press Council’s Rejection of Editors Guild’s Claim in 15th Press Council Constitution [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upheld Press Council of India’s rejection of Editors Guild’s claim, citing delay and non-compliance, and declined to interfere in 15th Press Council constitution.

19 January, 2026 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

madras-hc-seeks-larger-bench-to-reconsider-bar-on-enrolment-of-law-graduates-with-pending-criminal-cases
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Seeks Larger Bench To Reconsider Bar On Enrolment Of Law Graduates With Pending Criminal Cases [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers to larger bench to reconsider bar on enrolment of law graduates with pending criminal cases under Advocates Act.

15 January, 2026 05:28 PM
madras-hc-state-organizes-jallikattu-at-avaniyapuram-private-committees-cannot-claim-independent-right
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC: State Organizes Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; Private Committees Cannot Claim Independent Right [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that only the State can organize Jallikattu at Avaniyapuram; private committees have no independent right to conduct the event.

15 January, 2026 05:52 PM
sc-delivers-split-verdict-on-section-17a-of-prevention-of-corruption-act-refers-matter-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Delivers Split Verdict on Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act, Refers Matter to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court delivers a split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, with judges differing on its validity and referring the issue to a larger bench.

15 January, 2026 08:04 PM
daughter-in-law-widowed-after-father-in-laws-death-entitled-to-maintenance-from-his-estate-sc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Widowed After Father-in-Law’s Death Entitled to Maintenance from His Estate: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a daughter-in-law widowed after her father-in-law’s death can claim maintenance from his estate under Hindu law.

15 January, 2026 09:03 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email