38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

HC grants bail to three accused in TRS MLAs poaching case [ Read Order ]

By LawStreet News Network      02 December, 2022 06:45 PM      0 Comments
HC grants bail to three accused in TRS MLAs poaching case

NEW DELHI: The Telangana High Court has on Thursday granted bail to three persons arrested for allegedly making an attempt to poach four MLAs of ruling Telangana Rashtra Samiti.

Justice Chillakur Sumalatha told the accused to furnish a personal bond of Rs three lakh each and two sureties of the same amount. They have also been asked to appear before the Special Investigation Team every Monday.

Among other conditions, they have been told to share their contact details and not to influence the probe in the matter.

The order comes days after the top court asked the High Court to decide bail plea expeditiously.

The three accused Kore Nandu Kumar, Rama Chandra Bharati alias Satish Sharma V K Rao and DPSKVN Simhayaji were arrested on October 26, 2022, but their remand was rejected on October 27, 2022. Later, upon the orders of the High Court, they were again arrested on October 29, 2022 and were remanded to judicial custody.

They moved separate bail pleas before the trial court which on November 14 rejected it.

The accused claimed the investigation in the matter has been completed and relevant materials have been seized by the police and there was no question of tampering with the evidence.

The prosecution opposed the bail plea, saying they tried to destabilize the democratically elected government. They offered Rs 250 Cr as bribe for poaching the MLAs. They may leave the country if enlarged on bail. Further, there was other suspects in the case of conspiracy, warranting further investigation. They belonged to different states.

The court, however, said the accused had been in custody for over a month and they can be granted bail as the material part of the investigation was over.

Senior advocates Immaneni Rama Rao, and L Ravi Chander, and advocate G Naga Raju, and advocate K Vasu Deva Raju, argued for the accused. Additional Public Prosecutor T V Ramana Rao represented the State.

On November 21, the top court had voiced its displeasure with the direction by the High Court for the three accused to surrender.

It had expressed displeasure with the HC's single judge observation with regard to applicability of Arnesh Kumar judgement by the Supreme Court would not be treated as binding precedent in state of Telangana.

The top court had then asked the single judge bench to consider the bail plea of accused expeditiously as they have been behind the bars for over 22 days.

The Cyberabad police had on October 26 arrested the three accused on charges that they attempted to lure a few TRS MLAs to switch over to the BJP.

An Anti-Corruption Bureau's special court before which they were produced, however, had refused to remand them saying the police had failed to follow the Supreme Court guidelines regarding arrest as laid down in the 2014 ruling in Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar.

Read Order



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email