38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      23 December, 2024 05:07 AM      0 Comments
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates dismisses domestic violence petition

Jammu: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar has addressed advocate dress code regulations and a domestic violence petition. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi provided clear directives on court attire and procedural requirements.

The court examined the Bar Council of India Rules regarding advocate dress code, specifically addressing whether a woman advocate could appear with her face covered. The court noted, “It is nowhere stated in the rules that any such attire is permissible for appearing before this Court.”

The dress code for lady advocates, as detailed in Chapter IV (Part VI) of the Bar Council of India Rules, outlines acceptable attire, including “Black full sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar, stiff or soft, with white bands and Advocates’ Gowns” among other options, with no provision for face coverings.

The primary case involved a domestic violence petition wherein Mohammad Yasin Khan and his family members sought to quash proceedings initiated against them under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act. The court observed that the petitioners had improperly approached the High Court directly instead of pursuing the available remedies.

Addressing the procedural aspects, the court remarked, “The remedy of appeal is available to the petitioners against the impugned order, which has admittedly not been availed, and without having availed the said remedy, the petitioners could not have rushed to this Court.”

The court ultimately dismissed the petition, holding that it was not maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution, as the petitioners had failed to exhaust their remedy of appeal before the Court of Sessions as required under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act.

Mr. Salih Pirzada appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Adil, Advocate, appeared for the respondent.

Case title: Mohammad Yasin Khan & Ors vs Nazia Iqbal

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

[Domestic Violence] Maintenance order does not amount to protection order" holds Karnataka HC [Read Order] [Domestic Violence] Maintenance order does not amount to protection order" holds Karnataka HC [Read Order]

The Karnataka High Court recently held that an order granting maintenance does not amount to protection order and violation of the same will not attract section 31 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order under Domestic Violence Act [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order under Domestic Violence Act [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order for wife under Domestic Violence Act, rejecting husband's appeal and claims of reduced income.

High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order] High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order]

High Court of J&K & Ladakh clarifies advocate dress code, dismisses domestic violence petition for procedural non-compliance. Key directives issued.

Personal presence not required in Domestic Violence cases: SC [Read Judgment] Personal presence not required in Domestic Violence cases: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Personal presence not required in DV Act cases, as they are quasi-criminal and entail no penal consequences except for breach of a protection order.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-examine-petition-alleging-14-hour-illegal-custody-and-sexual-assault-of-woman-lawyer-by-noida-police
Trending Judiciary
SC to Examine Petition Alleging 14-Hour Illegal Custody and Sexual Assault of Woman Lawyer by Noida Police [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on a woman lawyer’s plea alleging illegal 14-hour custody, sexual assault, threats and evidence destruction by Noida Police.

30 December, 2025 12:26 AM
madras-hc-grants-interim-bail-to-youtube-journalist-savukku-shankar-raises-concerns-over-repeated-incarceration-and-abuse-of-process
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Grants Interim Bail to YouTube Journalist Savukku Shankar; Raises Concerns Over Repeated Incarceration and Abuse of Process [Read Order]

Madras High Court grants 12-week interim bail to YouTube journalist Savukku Shankar, flags repeated incarceration as abuse of process and violation of Article 21.

30 December, 2025 02:13 AM

TOP STORIES

green-shield-or-green-washed-the-legal-and-ecological-paradox-of-the-supreme-courts-new-100-metre-aravalli-standard
Trending Judiciary
Green Shield or Green-Washed? The Legal and Ecological Paradox of the Supreme Court’s New ‘100-Metre’ Aravalli Standard

Supreme Court’s new 100-metre Aravalli definition sparks legal and ecological debate, raising concerns over mining, biodiversity loss, and environmental protection.

26 December, 2025 05:29 PM
prima-facie-case-made-out-against-chatgpt-for-selective-exclusion-of-indiamart-from-search-results-matter-listed-for-further-hearing-calcutta-hc
Trending Business
Prima Facie Case Made Out Against ChatGPT for Selective Exclusion of IndiaMART from Search Results; Matter Listed for Further Hearing: Calcutta HC [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court finds prima facie case against ChatGPT for allegedly excluding IndiaMART from search results; matter listed for Jan 13, 2026.

26 December, 2025 06:30 PM
allahabad-hc-reaffirms-bar-on-revision-petitions-against-magistrates-order-to-register-fir-under-section-156-3-crpc
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Reaffirms Bar on Revision Petitions Against Magistrate’s Order to Register FIR under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court holds revision not maintainable against Magistrate’s order under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. directing registration of FIR.

26 December, 2025 09:44 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-orders-hsvp-to-revert-to-2018-plot-price-and-slashes-interest-rate-for-affected-persons
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Orders HSVP to Revert to 2018 Plot Price and Slashes Interest Rate for Affected Persons [Read Judgment]

Punjab and Haryana High Court orders HSVP to charge 2018 plot rates for land oustees, cuts interest from 11% to 5.5%, and allows six-year instalments.

26 December, 2025 10:20 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email