38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      23 December, 2024 05:07 AM      0 Comments
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates dismisses domestic violence petition

Jammu: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar has addressed advocate dress code regulations and a domestic violence petition. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi provided clear directives on court attire and procedural requirements.

The court examined the Bar Council of India Rules regarding advocate dress code, specifically addressing whether a woman advocate could appear with her face covered. The court noted, “It is nowhere stated in the rules that any such attire is permissible for appearing before this Court.”

The dress code for lady advocates, as detailed in Chapter IV (Part VI) of the Bar Council of India Rules, outlines acceptable attire, including “Black full sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar, stiff or soft, with white bands and Advocates’ Gowns” among other options, with no provision for face coverings.

The primary case involved a domestic violence petition wherein Mohammad Yasin Khan and his family members sought to quash proceedings initiated against them under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act. The court observed that the petitioners had improperly approached the High Court directly instead of pursuing the available remedies.

Addressing the procedural aspects, the court remarked, “The remedy of appeal is available to the petitioners against the impugned order, which has admittedly not been availed, and without having availed the said remedy, the petitioners could not have rushed to this Court.”

The court ultimately dismissed the petition, holding that it was not maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution, as the petitioners had failed to exhaust their remedy of appeal before the Court of Sessions as required under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act.

Mr. Salih Pirzada appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Adil, Advocate, appeared for the respondent.

Case title: Mohammad Yasin Khan & Ors vs Nazia Iqbal

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

[Domestic Violence] Maintenance order does not amount to protection order" holds Karnataka HC [Read Order] [Domestic Violence] Maintenance order does not amount to protection order" holds Karnataka HC [Read Order]

The Karnataka High Court recently held that an order granting maintenance does not amount to protection order and violation of the same will not attract section 31 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order under Domestic Violence Act [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order under Domestic Violence Act [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order for wife under Domestic Violence Act, rejecting husband's appeal and claims of reduced income.

High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order] High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order]

High Court of J&K & Ladakh clarifies advocate dress code, dismisses domestic violence petition for procedural non-compliance. Key directives issued.

Personal presence not required in Domestic Violence cases: SC [Read Judgment] Personal presence not required in Domestic Violence cases: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Personal presence not required in DV Act cases, as they are quasi-criminal and entail no penal consequences except for breach of a protection order.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email