38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      23 December, 2024 05:07 AM      0 Comments
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates dismisses domestic violence petition

Jammu: The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar has addressed advocate dress code regulations and a domestic violence petition. Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi provided clear directives on court attire and procedural requirements.

The court examined the Bar Council of India Rules regarding advocate dress code, specifically addressing whether a woman advocate could appear with her face covered. The court noted, “It is nowhere stated in the rules that any such attire is permissible for appearing before this Court.”

The dress code for lady advocates, as detailed in Chapter IV (Part VI) of the Bar Council of India Rules, outlines acceptable attire, including “Black full sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar, stiff or soft, with white bands and Advocates’ Gowns” among other options, with no provision for face coverings.

The primary case involved a domestic violence petition wherein Mohammad Yasin Khan and his family members sought to quash proceedings initiated against them under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act. The court observed that the petitioners had improperly approached the High Court directly instead of pursuing the available remedies.

Addressing the procedural aspects, the court remarked, “The remedy of appeal is available to the petitioners against the impugned order, which has admittedly not been availed, and without having availed the said remedy, the petitioners could not have rushed to this Court.”

The court ultimately dismissed the petition, holding that it was not maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution, as the petitioners had failed to exhaust their remedy of appeal before the Court of Sessions as required under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act.

Mr. Salih Pirzada appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Adil, Advocate, appeared for the respondent.

Case title: Mohammad Yasin Khan & Ors vs Nazia Iqbal

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

[Domestic Violence] Maintenance order does not amount to protection order" holds Karnataka HC [Read Order] [Domestic Violence] Maintenance order does not amount to protection order" holds Karnataka HC [Read Order]

The Karnataka High Court recently held that an order granting maintenance does not amount to protection order and violation of the same will not attract section 31 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order under Domestic Violence Act [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order under Domestic Violence Act [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds maintenance order for wife under Domestic Violence Act, rejecting husband's appeal and claims of reduced income.

High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order] High Court of J&K and Ladakh clarifies dress code rules for Advocates, dismisses domestic violence petition [Read Order]

High Court of J&K & Ladakh clarifies advocate dress code, dismisses domestic violence petition for procedural non-compliance. Key directives issued.

Personal presence not required in Domestic Violence cases: SC [Read Judgment] Personal presence not required in Domestic Violence cases: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Personal presence not required in DV Act cases, as they are quasi-criminal and entail no penal consequences except for breach of a protection order.

TRENDING NEWS

pil-in-supreme-court-seeks-removal-of-up-ips-officer-ajay-pal-sharma-as-election-observer-in-west-bengal-polls
Trending Judiciary
PIL in Supreme Court Seeks Removal of UP IPS Officer Ajay Pal Sharma as Election Observer in West Bengal Polls

PIL in Supreme Court challenges appointment of UP IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma as poll observer in West Bengal, alleging bias and violation of RP Act norms.

30 April, 2026 01:12 PM
bombay-hc-modifies-2046-order-in-defamation-suit-references-to-plaintiffs-age-and-20-year-adjournment-deleted-matter-listed-for-july
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Modifies “2046 Order” in Defamation Suit: References to Plaintiff’s Age and 20-Year Adjournment Deleted; Matter Listed for July [Read Order]

Bombay HC modifies ‘2046’ defamation order, deletes age and 20-year adjournment remarks, lists case for July 15, 2026 hearing.

30 April, 2026 01:18 PM

TOP STORIES

enough-is-enough-scwla-president-mahalakshmi-pavani-condemns-barbaric-attempt-to-murder-advocate-madhu-seeks-immediate-arrest-of-accused
Trending Legal Insiders
“Enough is Enough”: SCWLA President Mahalakshmi Pavani Condemns Barbaric Attempt to Murder Advocate Madhu, Seeks Immediate Arrest of Accused [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns brutal sword attack on Advocate Madhu Rajput; critical at AIIMS, accused absconding, immediate arrest demanded.

25 April, 2026 01:24 PM
sc-sets-3-week-deadline-for-nationwide-icu-standards-orders-states-to-submit-action-plans
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets 3-Week Deadline for Nationwide ICU Standards; Orders States to Submit Action Plans [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs States to finalise ICU standards within 3 weeks, impleads Nursing and Paramedical Councils in nationwide framework push.

25 April, 2026 04:30 PM
continuous-mobile-location-sharing-cannot-be-imposed-as-a-bail-condition-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
Continuous Mobile Location-Sharing Cannot Be Imposed As A Bail Condition: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court quashes bail condition mandating continuous mobile location-sharing, holding it amounts to impermissible electronic surveillance.

25 April, 2026 04:40 PM
police-cannot-arrest-accused-in-private-complaint-cases-absent-non-bailable-warrant-high-courts-should-not-entertain-anticipatory-bail-in-such-matters-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Arrest Accused in Private Complaint Cases Absent Non-Bailable Warrant; High Courts Should Not Entertain Anticipatory Bail in Such Matters: SC

Supreme Court rules police cannot arrest in private complaints without NBW; says High Courts should not entertain anticipatory bail in such cases.

25 April, 2026 05:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email