38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

High Court retains the power to quash an FIR, even after a charge-sheet under Section 173(2) is filed [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      04 September, 2024 03:28 PM      0 Comments
High Court retains the power to quash an FIR even after a charge-sheet under Section 173 2 is filed

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has affirmed the power of courts to quash FIRs even after charge sheets have been filed, emphasizing the need to consider changed circumstances and prevent the abuse of the legal process.

Justices Dipankar Datta and Ujjal Bhuyan heard two criminal appeals challenging the Gujarat High Court’s refusal to quash an FIR filed under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code.

The court emphasized a crucial legal principle, stating, “The High Court under Section 482, Cr. PC, retains the power to quash an FIR, even after a charge-sheet under Section 173(2) thereof is filed, provided satisfaction is reached, inter alia, that either the FIR and the charge-sheet read together, even accepted as true and correct without rebuttal, do not disclose the commission of any offense or that continuation of proceedings arising out of such an FIR would, in fact, be an abuse of the process of law as well as of the Court, given the peculiar circumstances of each particular case.”

Applying this principle to the case at hand, the court noted, “On the facts and in the circumstances of the present case, it is considered appropriate to give a quietus to the long-standing dispute between the private parties.”

The court observed that the complainant and her ex-husband had obtained a divorce by mutual consent in 2004, and the complainant had since remarried and had children from her second marriage. 

The court stated, “The complainant and the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1885/2013 have since severed their marital ties in 2004. The complainant is in her family way upon such severance of ties with the said appellant, and both the complainant and the said appellant are presently based out of India, well-settled in their respective lives.”

Expressing concern over the continuation of proceedings despite changed circumstances, the court noted, “That the complainant has no inclination to have her marital life disturbed is also evident from her non-participation in the present proceedings. That apart, the allegations leveled in the FIR are mostly vague and general in nature.”

The court concluded by invoking its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, stating, “Since the complainant is unrepresented, we deem it worthwhile to invoke our powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India for quashing the FIR, the charge-sheet, and all other proceedings in pursuance thereof.”

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision reaffirms the courts’ power to quash FIRs and subsequent proceedings, even after charge sheets have been filed, when circumstances have significantly changed and continuing the case would amount to an abuse of the legal process.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM

TOP STORIES

regulating-hate-restricting-speech-an-analysis-of-the-karnataka-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes-bill-2025
Trending Executive
Regulating Hate, Restricting Speech ? An Analysis Of The Karnataka Hate Speech And Hate Crimes Bill, 2025

Analysis of Karnataka’s Hate Speech Bill, 2025, examining vague definitions, harsh penalties, executive powers, and its impact on free speech.

04 January, 2026 12:48 AM
if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email