38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 28, 2024
Judiciary

Why No Action Against Accounts Posting Objectionable Content About Hindu Gods And Goddesses: Delhi High Court To Twitter

By LawStreet News Network      29 March, 2022 10:15 PM      0 Comments
Hindu Gods And Goddesses Delhi High Court To Twitter

The Delhi High Court on 28th March’2023, questioned social media platform Twitter upon not taking any action against those accounts which post ‘blasphemous’ and objectionable content about Hindu gods and goddesses. High Court while comprehending the present scenario highlighted that even the account of former United States President Donald Trump was suspended. 

A Division Bench consisting of Acting Chief Justice (ACJ) Vipin Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla said “It appears as if the micro-blogging platform resorted to harsh steps only if it (Twitter) felt sensitive about a post or information and would not take any action if people of other regions and ethnicities felt offended by some content.” 

It is ultimately boiling down to this; if you feel sensitive you will block and you do not feel sensitive about the other ethnicities or people of other regions. If the same kind of thing was done against other religions you would have been more serious,” ACJ Sanghi said. 

The Court, therefore, directed Twitter to file responses explaining its policies and protocols for permanently blocking an account of a user. The Central government was also directed to file a counter affidavit and place on record the standard operating procedure (SOP) relating to blocking access to an account or information.

The Court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by advocate Aditya Deshwal arguing that several objectionable posts were being made through a Twitter handle named Atheist Republic and Inspite of several complaints being made on the said behalf, Twitter has neither suspended the account nor taken down the offending content. 

On repeated occasions last year, Twitter was given directions by the High Court to strike down its content. A total of four posts were asked to be removed. Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra appearing for Twitter, informed that pursuant to the Court’s previous orders, the objectionable material has been taken down and police in some states have also registered FIRs in the matter. 

Luthra submitted that permanent blocking of an account can be done only following a court order to the same effect as per the Supreme Court’s judgment in Shreya Singhal case. 

I am not for a moment defending the act. It has nothing to do with twitter. They have posted a link through their handle. The underlying material is not on twitter the only thing that was on twitter was the link to the website. We have removed that as well… The mandate in the Shreya Singhal judgment is that I have to comply with lawful orders which I am happy to do. If they (petitioner) want to revisit the judgment they should lay a challenge to that,” Luthra submitted. 

However, Deshwal said that the new Information Technology Rules, 2021 put an onus on the social media intermediaries like Twitter and Facebook to curate and remove content that the same can be procceded with, only upon the direction of the Court is completely against the rule. 

The submission that social media intermediaries can act only after a court order is completely wrong. The new IT Rules give a free hand to social media intermediaries to regulate their content. As far as my case is concerned this Atheist Republic is a habitual offender. Armin Navabi is the founder of this account and he is mocking even the proceedings. They are circulating blasphemous content. They may be atheists but they cannot ridicule other religions,” he said. 

Advocate Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, appearing for the Central government, told the court that there is an SOP between Centre and Twitter for blocking of accounts.

Counsel Vrinda Bhandari appearing on behalf of the Atheist Republic, said “We are not contesting the tweets which have been taken down but blocking accounts is a very strong action. We should be heard before that. Please see the blocking rules. It says the party whose content is to be taken down should be heard as well. I am only saying blocking should not be ordered. I am willing to comply with the order, she submitted. 

The Court has arraigned Atheist Republic as respondent in the case and issued notice to it. The Bench also recorded her undertaking that all offending material has already been removed or directed to be removed from its account. 

The matter has been listed for its next hearing on September 6’2022.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

delhi-high-court-warns-against-aaps-call-for-protest-in-court-premises-amid-kejriwal-arrest
Trending Judiciary
Delhi High Court Warns Against AAP's Call for Protest in Court Premises Amid Kejriwal Arrest

Delhi High Court warns Aam Aadmi Party's Legal Cell of severe action for any protest in Delhi Courts against Arvind Kejriwal's arrest.

27 March, 2024 05:57 PM
gross-negligence-and-illegality-bombay-hc-orders-legal-action-against-doctor-for-improper-post-mortem-examination
Trending Judiciary
Gross negligence and illegality: Bombay HC orders legal action against doctor for improper post mortem examination [Read Order]

Bombay HC orders legal action to be taken against a doctor for negligence during post-mortem examination.

27 March, 2024 06:33 PM

TOP STORIES

global-entertainment-giants-warner-bros-netflix-amazon-get-relief-from-delhi-hc-in-copyright-protection-case
Trending Business
Global entertainment giants Warner Bros, Netflix, Amazon get relief from Delhi HC in copyright protection case

Delhi HC grants relief to global entertainment giants like Netflix, Amazon, Warner Bros, ordering takedown of copyrighted content on rogue websites.

22 March, 2024 12:13 PM
arvind-kejriwal-arrested-can-cm-administer-a-region-while-being-in-jail
Trending Top Stories
Arvind Kejriwal Arrested | Can CM administer a region while being in jail?

Will President's rule be imposed in Delhi after Kejriwal’s arrest? Read the full article to know more.

22 March, 2024 03:16 PM
merely-because-you-are-politician-cant-bypass-statutory-remedies-procedure-sc-refuses-to-consider-bail-by-kavitha
Trending Judiciary
'Merely because you are politician, can't bypass statutory remedies, procedure,' SC refuses to consider bail by Kavitha

Supreme Court denies bail to politician Kavitha in Delhi Liquor Policy Scam; ED alleges Rs 100 crore illegal gratification.

22 March, 2024 03:34 PM
ponmudi-to-be-sworn-in-as-minister-tn-governor-relents-before-sc
Trending Judiciary
Ponmudi to be sworn in as Minister, TN Governor relents before SC

Tamil Nadu Governor relents to Supreme Court's order, agrees to swear in DMK leader K Ponmudi as Minister after court's rap.

22 March, 2024 03:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email