38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Hiring Maid, Postpartum Depression, Not Grounds to Deny Custody Rights to Mother: Bombay High Court [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      26 May, 2025 02:04 PM      0 Comments
Hiring Maid Postpartum Depression Not Grounds to Deny Custody Rights to Mother Bombay High Court

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has delivered a decision clarifying that a mother’s employment of household assistance for childcare purposes does not constitute valid grounds for stripping her of custody privileges, recognizing such arrangements as standard practice in contemporary family settings.

Justice R.M. Joshi delivered the judgment in a marital dispute concerning custody arrangements, underscoring the supreme consideration of child welfare and the protection of maternal prerogatives in custody determinations.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a father challenging a Family Court order that awarded custody of their son, under two years of age, to his estranged wife. The couple’s son was born on June 12, 2023, with the custody battle emerging following the mother’s departure from the marital residence.

The petitioner father challenged the Family Court’s verdict on several grounds, chiefly asserting that his wife was medically incompetent due to postpartum depression and mental health concerns. Additionally, he alleged that she was not providing direct personal care to the infant, instead relying on hired domestic assistance.

Justice Joshi categorically dismissed these contentions, remarking, “Even if it is accepted that a maid servant is engaged by the respondent, it is not uncommon for a maid servant to be engaged where there is a small child in the house. In such circumstances, the said fact, even if it is accepted to be true, will not become a ground to cause interference in the impugned order.”

The bench reinforced established jurisprudence requiring fathers to substantiate claims of maternal incompetence when seeking custody of children under five years. Justice Joshi observed, “The burden is on the father to show that the mother is unable to take care of the child below the age of 5 years, and in absence of any material to that effect, there is no reason to cause any interference in the impugned order.”

Examining the medical documentation submitted by the petitioner, the court determined that the mother’s anxiety and depressive symptoms did not render her unfit for parental duties. The Family Court had previously noted, “Anxiety/depression is not a very serious issue. Feeling nervous now and then is not so much abnormal. It is a normal response to a stressful situation.”

The court placed special emphasis on nursing considerations and also relied on the judgment of the apex court in Pushpa Singh vs. Inderjit Singh, wherein it was observed, “Mother’s milk is most important for a child’s physical and mental development. Breastfeeding is an inalienable right of a lactating mother protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Similarly, it is the right of the suckling infant for being breastfed too.”

The court also took note of the fact that the infant had remained in maternal care for roughly eight months without any documented adverse effects on the child’s well-being. The court stated, “Nothing absolutely is brought on record to indicate that the child’s custody with the mother is not in his interest.”

The court also censured the father’s deployment of offensive and disparaging terminology in his legal submissions, which the Family Court had sanctioned with monetary penalties of Rs. 5,000. The court further endorsed this disciplinary measure, citing the Supreme Court’s Guidelines on Eliminating Gender Bias, which stress that “Language is critical to the life of law” and that improper language “undermines the dignity of individuals, based on their gender.”

The court observed that, considering the facts recorded by the learned Family Court Judge, the imposition of a cost of Rs. 5,000/- appeared to be rather lenient. However, it noted that since the respondent had not challenged that part of the order, there was no occasion to enhance the said cost. The court further stated that there was no reason or justification to interfere with the impugned order and, accordingly, held that the petition stood dismissed. It also recorded that any pending civil applications stood disposed of.

Mr. R. G. Joshi, Advocate appeared for the Petitioner, whereas Mr. P. S. Shendurnikar, Advocate appeared for the Respondent.

Case Title: S.S. vs. S.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release

The Bombay High Court on December 6, 2018, dismissed a petition filed against upcoming movie Kedarnath seeking a direction to stay the release of the movie

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order] Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order]

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband || "It is open for the court to decide the application filed by the husband under Section 25 of the 1955 Act, seeking monthly maintenance, by way of final proceedings, pending which, the application for interim maintenance filed under Section 24 of the Act of 1955, has been rightly entertained by the learned Judge and the husband has been held entitled to interim maintenance while the proceedings under Section 25 are pending," she noted.

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief || "There is something or the other going against every leader of the NCP, Congress and Shiv Sena... Prime Minister Narendra Modi has one thing in mind: he wants BJP rule from Kashmir to Kanyakumari, irrespective of the wishes of the people," Pawar said.

Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By  Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist

The magistrate court issues the process if it finds prima facie substance in the allegations made in the complaint. Once the process is issued, the accused persons have to appear before the court.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email