38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 30, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

How long can he be kept in jail, SC on Ashish Mishra bail plea in Lakhimpur Kheri violence incident [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      13 December, 2022 12:38 AM      0 Comments
How long can he be kept in jail, SC on Ashish Mishra bail plea in Lakhimpur Kheri violence incident

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Uttar Pradesh government as to how long Ashish Mishra, an accused in Lakhimpur Kheri violence case can be kept behind the bars as putting him inside the jail indefinitely amounted to prejudging him and there has to be balance between rights of the accused and the victims.

Hearing a bail plea filed by Ashish Mishra, prime accused in the 2021 incident, a bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Krishna Murari asked its registrar to ascertain from the Additional Sessions Judge, Lakhimpur Kheri, how much time the trial in the case is likely to take to conclude.

Mishra is the son of Union Minister of Home, Ajay Mishra Teni.

As Additional Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh Garima Prasad opposed bail plea of Mishra, the bench asked her, how long someone should be kept in, the victim has rights, the accused also has some rights, society has interest in all these things, keeping him indefinitely would amount to pre-judging him as guilty.

The state counsel said it is a grave offence and there statements of injured eyewitnesses regarding Mishras presence at the crime spot.

Appearing for Mishra, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi said his client was not present at the crime spot.

Opposing the bail plea, senior advocate Dushyant Dave, for the victims families, said that in murder cases when trial court and the high court had refused bail, then in such matters the apex court should not interfere.

He said this is a very serious case and pointed out that witnesses in the case have already been attacked.

The bench said the witnesses have been granted protection as per order of the court.

Rohatgi, for his part, said the records showed that the person in the car was one Sumit Jaiswal and his client was not at the scene of the crime.

He said that Mishra was at a wrestling match and there are records of mobile tower locations prove that he was at a different place.

He also wondered how murder charge is attracted against him.

Dave submitted that crime was premeditated and cited Mishra's father's statement that protesting farmers will be taught a lesson.

If someone can be killed merely because they are agitating, then nobody is safe in a democracy," Dave said.

Following the arguments, the bench sought details of the time frame within which the trial would be completed.

The court also asked the UP government to file an additional affidavit giving details about the progress and pace of investigation and proceedings.

The top court will take up the matter for further hearing in January next year.

On October 3, 2021, eight people, including four farmers, were killed in Lakhimpur Kheri in clashes during a farmers' protest. Mishra was arrested on October 9 last year in the case.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

wifes-domestic-violence-complaint-filed-after-divorce-petition-amounts-to-fresh-cruelty-condonation-cannot-bar-relief-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Domestic Violence Complaint Filed After Divorce Petition Amounts to Fresh Cruelty; Condonation Cannot Bar Relief: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC grants divorce, holds wife’s post-petition DV complaint amounts to fresh cruelty; condonation cannot bar relief.

30 March, 2026 05:15 PM
daughter-in-law-not-legally-obligated-to-maintain-parents-in-law-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Not Legally Obligated to Maintain Parents-in-Law: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules daughter-in-law not liable to maintain parents-in-law under BNSS; moral obligation not legally enforceable.

30 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email