38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

If no apology, may examine whether re-tweeting is criminal or not, SC to Delhi CM in defamation case

By Jhanak Sharma      12 March, 2024 02:04 PM      0 Comments
If no apology may examine whether retweeting is criminal or not SC to Delhi CM in defamation case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday gave Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal an option to tender an apology or it would examine the legal issue whether merely re-tweeting is a criminal offence of defamation or not.

A bench of justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta told senior advocate A M Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, So, if you want to give an apology, you can circulate it without prejudice to your rights and contentions. Let him (complainant) examine.

Otherwise, we will examine the legal issue whether merely re-tweeting is a criminal offence or not, the bench said.

Kejriwal challenged a Delhi High Court order, which upheld the summons issued to him as an accused in the criminal defamation case.

Also Read: Made mistake by retweeting, Arvind Kejriwal to SC in defamation case

A counsel, representing the complainant Vikas Sankrityayan, said that the AAP leader may issue an apology on public platforms like microblogging platform X or Instagram.

The bench asked the counsel that he should inform the court what he wants and it can put it to the other side.

We are not going to step into your shoes or the other sides shoes, the bench told the complainants counsel. The apex court told the complainants counsel that his client can give the format of the apology to Kejriwal.

The apex court said its earlier order for the trial court not to proceed in the defamation case till March 11 would continue till the next date of hearing.

The bench fixed the matter for further hearing in the week commencing May 13.

Earlier on February 26, Kejriwal told the court that he made a mistake by retweeting an allegedly defamatory video circulated by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee related to the BJP IT Cell.

The court had asked the complainant whether he wanted to close the matter in view of the petitioner accepting it was a mistake.

The High Court had earlier said that reposting alleged libellous content would attract the defamation law. It had rejected Kejriwal's contention that the trial court erred in not providing any reasons for issuing the summons. The complainant claimed the YouTube video titled BJP IT Cell Part II was circulated by Rathee, who lives in Germany, wherein a number of false and defamatory allegations were made.

Also Read: PM's Degree: HC issues notice to Gujarat University on plea by Kejriwal, Sanjay Singh

 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Hike income cap for EWS school admission to Rs 5 lakh: Delhi High Court Hike income cap for EWS school admission to Rs 5 lakh: Delhi High Court

Court asked Delhi government to increase the cap on annual family income for admission to schools under EWS. Here's why

Excise Policy Scam: CM Arvind Kejriwal dismisses ED notice as illegal Excise Policy Scam: CM Arvind Kejriwal dismisses ED notice as illegal

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal addressed the media amid speculation of his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) concerning the alleged liquor scam. Here's what he said.

Delhi HC refuses to quash summons to CM Kejriwal for retweeting Dhruv Rathee's video against BJP Delhi HC refuses to quash summons to CM Kejriwal for retweeting Dhruv Rathee's video against BJP

The Delhi High Court has refused to quash summons to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal for retweeting Dhruv Rathee's video against the BJP.

AAP grabs Delhi High Courts land in the national capital, Supreme Court shocked AAP grabs Delhi High Courts land in the national capital, Supreme Court shocked

The Supreme Court today expressed its shock at Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwals Aam Aadmi Party encroaching on a land allotted to the Delhi High Court in the national capital.

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email