38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Interim Relief to Arnab Goswami by the Rajasthan High Court

By Shashwata Sahu      20 May, 2022 07:46 PM      0 Comments
Interim Relief Arnab Goswami Rajasthan High Court

On Friday, the Rajasthan High Court granted interim protection from arrest to Republic TV Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami in a case filed against him under Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for promoting enmity between religious groups.

Police in Rajasthan's Udaipur registered a first information report against Goswami on May 17 after Pawan Khera, a spokesperson for the Congress party, filed a complaint against Republic Bharat's broadcasting of a certain news show (Hindi channel of Republic).

Arnab Goswami requested a quashing of the FIR in the High Court. Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethamalani brought up the issue before Justice Sandeep Mehta, who directed the police not to use any coercive steps against those mentioned in the FIR. PThe next hearing on this case will take place on May 23.

According to the plea, the FIR was filed with the express purpose of harassing and embroiling Republic TV in legal proceedings.

The plea said that,

"The current FIR has been filed at the behest of Mr. Pawan Khera, who is the Spokesperson, All India Congress Committee and represents the Indian National Congress in various TV talk shows, discussions/debates that are held on different news channels etc. as per his own complaint. It must be noted that in a case where the Congress government of the state of Rajasthan was being questioned, a member of the Congress has filed a complaint. This establishes how the entire case is motivated and made to harass and embroil a legitimate news network and its members in a litany of cases. "

The reported temple demolitions in Rajgarh and Alwar were the subject of the broadcast in question. Goswami stated that the purpose of the broadcasts was to keep the peace rather than to disrupt it.

The petition stated that the alleged demolition in Rajgarh was a matter of concern.

"In fact, the channels also covered how a Muslim Group had filed a complaint naming Congress Zilla Head Yogesh Mishra for vitiating harmony in the region. Therefore, far from causing strife, the Republic was exposing it.", the plea stated.

On the Alwar demolition, the programme used the phrase "Jahangirpuri ka badla?" Goswami said that line was not made in reference to any particular community, but rather to question whether the demolition campaign was politically motivated.

The petition stated that:

"It is submitted that there was an uproar over a demolition drive in New Delhis Jahangirpuri on 20 - 21st April, 2022. This demolition was being done by the Delhi MCD, which is headed by the BJP. Soon after, there was news of the Alwar Demolition in Rajasthan, where there was a Congress government in power. Therefore, the question of 'Jahangirpuri Ka Badla' is being raised in the context of its being a political battle over demolition."

The broadcast did not cause any public disorder after it broadcasted, establishing that it did not pose any threat to or disturb the peace on the ground, according to the petition.

It was contended that allowing the proceedings to continue would have a chilling effect on free speech and violate Article 19(1)(a), which guarantees freedom of speech and expression.

Besides Jethmalani, Senior Advocate Malvika Trivedi, advocates Muktesh Maheshwari, Ravi Sharma, and Siya Chaudhary, along with the team of Phoenix legal, appeared for Arnab Goswami.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

arbitration-agreement-valid-without-signatures-if-consensus-evident-from-conduct-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Arbitration Agreement Valid Without Signatures if Consensus Evident from Conduct: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Arbitration agreement valid even without signatures if parties’ conduct shows intent to arbitrate, rules Kerala High Court in Sigmatic Nidhi Ltd v. Suresh Kumar.

12 November, 2025 11:29 AM
madras-hc-refers-questions-of-caste-certificate-verification-after-retirement-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Refers Questions Of Caste Certificate Verification After Retirement To Larger Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers issue of caste certificate verification after retirement to larger bench amid conflicting rulings on post-retirement inquiries.

12 November, 2025 11:39 AM

TOP STORIES

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
adult-christian-daughter-not-entitled-to-maintenance-us-125-crpc-unless-disabled-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Adult Christian Daughter Not Entitled to Maintenance u/s 125 CrPC Unless Disabled: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court held that an adult Christian daughter cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless unable to maintain herself due to disability.

07 November, 2025 04:57 PM
magistrates-power-to-order-probe-under-section-156-3-crpc-cannot-be-invalidated-for-mere-technical-errors-sc
Trending Judiciary
Magistrate’s Power to Order Probe Under Section 156(3) CrPC Cannot Be Invalidated for Mere Technical Errors: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a Magistrate’s order under Section 156(3) CrPC cannot be nullified for minor technical or linguistic errors if offences are made out.

07 November, 2025 05:05 PM
physiotherapists-and-occupational-therapists-cannot-use-dr-prefix-without-medical-qualification-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Physiotherapists And Occupational Therapists Cannot Use ‘Dr’ Prefix Without Medical Qualification: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court restrains physiotherapists and occupational therapists from using ‘Dr.’ prefix without recognized medical qualification.

07 November, 2025 05:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email