38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Unnecessary Delay in Investigation Violates Right to Fair and Speedy Trial Under Article 21: Punjab and Haryana High Court [READ ORDER]

By Saakshi Singh Rawat      29 May, 2021 03:00 PM      0 Comments
Unnecessary Delay in Investigation Violates Right to Fair and Speedy Trial Under Article 21: Punjab and Haryana High Court [READ ORDER]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that "Unreasonable delay in closing an investigation is breach of the right to a fair and speedy investigation and trial mentioned under Article 21 of the Constitution." 

A Division Bench of Justice Rajan Gupta and Justice Karamjit Singh made the statements in the suo moto case seeking expeditious disposition of criminal charges against legislators in accordance with Supreme Court order passed in Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Anr.

The Bench requested various Central and State agencies that are investigating these instances to notify the Court of any excessive delay, if any, in the conclusion of the investigation(s) currently before them on the next date of hearing. They further stated that the States and Central agency both should ensure that order given should is examined under the respective investigating officers for ensuring due compliance. 

Till present date, 163 cases are pending before the State of Punjab against the MPs and MLAs, In Haryana 21 cases are in the trail process which includes 7 cases against Ex-MLAs and 2 Ex-MLAs of Himachal Pradesh and 1 against Delhi Ex-MLA. Out of those 21 cases 15 are pending in the Trail Courts and other 6 in the Appellate/Revisional courts. Another 3 which were registered under the Haryana Court are being sent to CBI for further investigation. Chandigarh has 7 investigation cases but no pending Trail Case. 

The CBI has been given time to present pertinent information pertaining to cases before the Anti-Corruption Bureau and Special Crime Branch, Chandigarh, as well as details of such cases where investigation is still underway. The case has been rescheduled until July 19.

Case Title: Court On Its Own Motion v. State Of Punjab & Ors.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email