38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Unnecessary Delay in Investigation Violates Right to Fair and Speedy Trial Under Article 21: Punjab and Haryana High Court [READ ORDER]

By Saakshi Singh Rawat      29 May, 2021 03:00 PM      0 Comments
Unnecessary Delay in Investigation Violates Right to Fair and Speedy Trial Under Article 21: Punjab and Haryana High Court [READ ORDER]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that "Unreasonable delay in closing an investigation is breach of the right to a fair and speedy investigation and trial mentioned under Article 21 of the Constitution." 

A Division Bench of Justice Rajan Gupta and Justice Karamjit Singh made the statements in the suo moto case seeking expeditious disposition of criminal charges against legislators in accordance with Supreme Court order passed in Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Anr.

The Bench requested various Central and State agencies that are investigating these instances to notify the Court of any excessive delay, if any, in the conclusion of the investigation(s) currently before them on the next date of hearing. They further stated that the States and Central agency both should ensure that order given should is examined under the respective investigating officers for ensuring due compliance. 

Till present date, 163 cases are pending before the State of Punjab against the MPs and MLAs, In Haryana 21 cases are in the trail process which includes 7 cases against Ex-MLAs and 2 Ex-MLAs of Himachal Pradesh and 1 against Delhi Ex-MLA. Out of those 21 cases 15 are pending in the Trail Courts and other 6 in the Appellate/Revisional courts. Another 3 which were registered under the Haryana Court are being sent to CBI for further investigation. Chandigarh has 7 investigation cases but no pending Trail Case. 

The CBI has been given time to present pertinent information pertaining to cases before the Anti-Corruption Bureau and Special Crime Branch, Chandigarh, as well as details of such cases where investigation is still underway. The case has been rescheduled until July 19.

Case Title: Court On Its Own Motion v. State Of Punjab & Ors.

 

[READ ORDER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-sets-aside-bail-to-actor-darshan-warns-jail-officials-against-vip-treatment
Trending CelebStreet
SC sets aside bail to actor Darshan; warns jail officials against VIP treatment

SC cancels bail to actor Darshan in murder case; slams VIP jail perks, warns officials to uphold rule of law and treat all accused equally.

14 August, 2025 12:30 PM
sc-refuses-stay-on-directions-for-immediate-shifting-of-stray-dogs-to-shelter-homes
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses stay on directions for immediate shifting of stray dogs to shelter homes

SC refuses to stay order directing urgent relocation of stray dogs in Delhi-NCR; asks intervenors to file affidavits amid rising dog bite concerns.

14 August, 2025 03:33 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email