38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, February 08, 2023
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us
Judiciary

'Is HC powerless', SC on Rana Ayyub's plea against summons in Covid fund misuse case

By Lawstreet News Network      13 days ago      0 Comments      369 Views
'Is HC powerless', SC on Rana Ayyub's plea against summons in Covid fund misuse case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked journalist Rana Ayyub, if the High Court concerned is powerless to decide her plea, questioning jurisdiction of Uttar Pradesh court in a case of money laundering lodged for misuse of Covid-19 relief fund.

A bench of Justices Krishna Murari and V Ramasubramanian, however, requested the Ghaziabad court which issued summons against Rana Ayyub for January 27 to adjourn its hearing.

The top court posted Rana Ayyub's writ petition for consideration on January 31, having noted that it could not conclude its hearing on Wednesday due to paucity of time.

Ayyub led by advocate Vrinda Grover challenged the jurisdiction assumed by Ghaziabad court. The petitioner cannot be subjected to UP jurisdiction, she said, seeking protection against her against any coercive action.

"How does Article 32 plea lie here? The jurisdictional HC can look into this. Is the HC powerless to do it," the bench asked the counsel.

"It is part of the record that Ghaziabad court is not a jurisdictional court. The court here is Mumbai. My liberty is at stake," Grover said.

She further contended that there was no charge sheet, no arrest of petitioner. The petitioner is being dragged to UP court, even though the investigation is by Delhi zonal office.

She sought four to six week's protection, if the petitioner is directed to approach the Allahabad High Court.

Appearing on behalf of the Enforcement Directorate, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, opposed the plea, contending crowdfunding has emerged as a new device by which money is being collected in guise of help for the down trodden and the poor.

"Every citizen is equal in eyes of law. She may file an anticipatory bail application," he said, contesting the protection sought by her.

The investigators claimed Ayyub had launched the fund raising campaigns with the sole intention to cheat the general public and acquired proceeds of crime in form of fixed deposits and balances in bank accounts projecting them as untainted.

The ED had initiated its probe after an FIR was registered in September 2021 by the Indirapuram Police Station in Ghaziabad under provisions of the Indian Penal Code, Information Technology Amendment Act and Black Money Act against Ayyub.

The investigators claimed she collected Rs 2.69 Cr but used just Rs 29 lakh for relief works and utilised huge chunk for making fixed deposits.



Tags:
Supreme Court of IndiaJournalist Rana AyyubJournalist High CourtUttar PradeshMoney LaunderingCovid 19Justice Krishna MurariJustice V RamasubramanianGhaziabad courtAdvocate Vrinda Grover MumbaiAllahabad High CourtEnforcement DirectorateSolicitor General Tushar MehtaFIRIndian Penal CodeInformation Technology Amendment ActBlack Money
Share this article:


Lawstreet News Network
Editor
     



Leave a feedback about this




Related Posts
View All

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

Crime, Police And Law
Gorakhnath temple attacker awarded death penalty
7 days ago

ADVERTISEMENT


Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email