38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 20, 2024
Judiciary

Jharkhand HC orders Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants in Santhal Pargana amid demographic concerns [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      12 August, 2024 02:05 PM      0 Comments
Jharkhand HC orders Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants in Santhal Pargana amid demographic concerns

Jharkhand: The Jharkhand High Court has issued a significant order directing the state government to utilize its Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants in the Santhal Pargana region, following a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlighting alleged illegal immigration from Bangladesh.

In an order passed on August 8, 2024, a Division Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad and Justice Arun Kumar Rai issued several directives aimed at addressing the issue of illegal immigration and its impact on the region’s demographics.

The court noted that the petitioner, Danyaal Danish, had filed a PIL raising concerns about illegal immigrants leading to demographic changes in Jharkhand, particularly in the Santhal Pargana region. The petition presented data showing a significant decrease in the tribal population and an increase in the Muslim population in the region between 1951 and 2011.

The court also noted that the Deputy Commissioners of Godda, Jamtara, Pakur, Dumka, Sahibganj, and Deoghar had not complied with the court’s earlier directives.

The court observed that despite specific instructions given on July 3, 2024, and reiterated on July 18, 2024, the required affidavits had not been filed. The court stated, “However, it must be noted that the affidavit which was directed to be filed, pursuant to the order dated July 3, 2024, by the Deputy Commissioners of the districts of Godda, Jamtara, Pakur, Dumka, Sahibganj, and Deoghar, has not been filed to date, even though the specific direction was passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on July 18, 2024, rejecting the affidavit filed on July 16, 2024, as it was not in consonance with the order dated July 3, 2024.”

The court further added, “No affidavit has been filed by the Deputy Commissioners of the concerned districts; the reasons are best known to them. The Deputy Commissioners, for any reason whatsoever, ought to have made an application/affidavit showing the reason as to why the affidavits have not been filed.”

Also Read: Jharkhand HC takes suo moto action against Universal LexisNexis for error in New Criminal Law Publication [Read Order]

The court also criticized the lackadaisical approach of the district administration, noting that ration cards, voter cards, and even Aadhaar cards have reportedly been issued based on documents of questionable authenticity. The court pointed out that infiltrators are exploiting these improperly obtained documents to access beneficial schemes intended for the welfare of local residents.

Expressing its view on the seriousness of the matter, the court stated, “This Court is further of the view that since the issue of infiltration has been considered an external aggression by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sarbananda Sonowal v. Union of India and Anr. (supra) and Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. (supra), this Court believes that the services of the Intelligence Bureau will also be effective in dealing with the issue.”

The court directed the state government to utilize its Special Branch for identifying infiltrators and illegal immigrants. It expressed surprise at why the Special Branch, which is equipped to gather such information, had not already been employed for this purpose.

Additionally, the court ordered the impleading of several central agencies as respondents, including the Border Security Force, UIDAI, Election Commission of India, Intelligence Bureau, and National Investigation Agency. The Intelligence Bureau was specifically directed to submit a report on the issue in a sealed cover.

In conclusion, the court’s directives reflect its concern over the alleged demographic changes and its intent to address the issue of illegal immigration in the state. The case has been listed for further hearing on August 22, 2024.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket Sourav is a student at National Law University and Judicial Academy Assam.



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Dhanbad Judge's Death: Jharkhand High Court Asks CBI to Probe Injury Angle Dhanbad Judge's Death: Jharkhand High Court Asks CBI to Probe Injury Angle

The judge was struck by an autorickshaw with a passenger in the front seat, as well as the driver. A motorcyclist is also seen following the autorickshaw that saw the injured judge fall to the ground. Jharkhand High Court, Jharkhand High Court chief justice, Jharkhand High Court judgement, Jharkhand High Court order, CBI

Supreme Court Collegium approves new Chief Justices for five key High Courts in India [Read Recommendations] Supreme Court Collegium approves new Chief Justices for five key High Courts in India [Read Recommendations]

Read about the latest judicial appointments in India: The Supreme Court Collegium, led by the Chief Justice of India, has approved new Chief Justices for the High Courts of Allahabad, Jharkhand, Gauhati, Punjab and Haryana, and Rajasthan. Get detailed insights on the judges appointed and their respective high courts.

'Arbitrary, impermissible,' SC quashes HC's resolution raising aggregate cut off marks on district judges appointment [Read Judgment] 'Arbitrary, impermissible,' SC quashes HC's resolution raising aggregate cut off marks on district judges appointment [Read Judgment]

SC overturns Jharkhand HC's post-exam 50% cut-off for judge candidates, calling it arbitrary and enforcing no mid-process rule changes.

Jharkhand High Court issues notice to ED in Hemant Soren's plea challenging arrest Jharkhand High Court issues notice to ED in Hemant Soren's plea challenging arrest

Jharkhand HC will hear Hemant Sorens plea challenging EDs arrest on February 27.

TRENDING NEWS

delhi-hc-orders-mcd-to-pay-10-lakh-compensation-in-minors-death-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC orders MCD to pay ₹10 Lakh compensation in minor's death case [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC directs MCD to pay ₹10 lakh for a minor's death due to negligence, applying res ipsa loquitur and affirming compensation for fundamental rights violations.

19 September, 2024 10:36 AM
sc-orders-release-of-convict-on-personal-bond-cites-injustice-in-denying-bail-due-to-inability-to-furnish-local-surety
Trending Judiciary
SC orders release of convict on Personal Bond, cites injustice in denying bail due to inability to furnish Local Surety [Read Order]

SC: Justice delivery mechanism must consider plight of indigent convicts unable to furnish local surety, orders release of convict on personal bond.

19 September, 2024 11:05 AM

TOP STORIES

rajasthan-hc-orders-10-year-passport-for-undertrial-in-matrimonial-dispute-cites-right-to-livelihood
Trending Judiciary
Rajasthan HC orders 10-year passport for undertrial in matrimonial dispute, cites right to livelihood [Read Order]

Rajasthan HC directs issuance of a 10-year passport to an undertrial in a matrimonial dispute, upholding the right to livelihood despite ongoing legal proceedings.

14 September, 2024 05:04 PM
himachal-pradesh-hc-clarifies-the-scope-of-section-482-crpc-in-compoundable-offences
Trending Judiciary
Himachal Pradesh HC clarifies the scope of Section 482 CrPC in compoundable offences [Read Order]

Himachal Pradesh HC clarifies that Section 482 CrPC cannot be invoked for compoundable offences when an alternative remedy under Section 320(1) is available.

14 September, 2024 05:36 PM
sc-bars-kejriwal-from-commenting-on-cbi-case-in-liquor-policy
Trending Judiciary
SC bars Kejriwal from commenting on CBI case in liquor policy

SC restrains Kejriwal from commenting on CBI case in liquor policy, grants bail with conditions, prohibiting visits to CM office and signing files.

16 September, 2024 10:33 AM
sc-rejects-plea-to-re-appear-in-neet-ug-for-not-being-allowed-to-carry-handkerchief
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects plea to re-appear in NEET UG for not being allowed to carry handkerchief [Read Judgment]

SC dismisses NEET UG candidate's plea to reappear due to a handkerchief ban, citing no significant impact on performance from hyperhidrosis during the exam.

16 September, 2024 10:37 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email