38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Jharkhand HC orders Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants in Santhal Pargana amid demographic concerns [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      12 August, 2024 02:05 PM      0 Comments
Jharkhand HC orders Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants in Santhal Pargana amid demographic concerns

Jharkhand: The Jharkhand High Court has issued a significant order directing the state government to utilize its Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants in the Santhal Pargana region, following a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlighting alleged illegal immigration from Bangladesh.

In an order passed on August 8, 2024, a Division Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad and Justice Arun Kumar Rai issued several directives aimed at addressing the issue of illegal immigration and its impact on the region’s demographics.

The court noted that the petitioner, Danyaal Danish, had filed a PIL raising concerns about illegal immigrants leading to demographic changes in Jharkhand, particularly in the Santhal Pargana region. The petition presented data showing a significant decrease in the tribal population and an increase in the Muslim population in the region between 1951 and 2011.

The court also noted that the Deputy Commissioners of Godda, Jamtara, Pakur, Dumka, Sahibganj, and Deoghar had not complied with the court’s earlier directives.

The court observed that despite specific instructions given on July 3, 2024, and reiterated on July 18, 2024, the required affidavits had not been filed. The court stated, “However, it must be noted that the affidavit which was directed to be filed, pursuant to the order dated July 3, 2024, by the Deputy Commissioners of the districts of Godda, Jamtara, Pakur, Dumka, Sahibganj, and Deoghar, has not been filed to date, even though the specific direction was passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on July 18, 2024, rejecting the affidavit filed on July 16, 2024, as it was not in consonance with the order dated July 3, 2024.”

The court further added, “No affidavit has been filed by the Deputy Commissioners of the concerned districts; the reasons are best known to them. The Deputy Commissioners, for any reason whatsoever, ought to have made an application/affidavit showing the reason as to why the affidavits have not been filed.”

Also Read: Jharkhand HC takes suo moto action against Universal LexisNexis for error in New Criminal Law Publication [Read Order]

The court also criticized the lackadaisical approach of the district administration, noting that ration cards, voter cards, and even Aadhaar cards have reportedly been issued based on documents of questionable authenticity. The court pointed out that infiltrators are exploiting these improperly obtained documents to access beneficial schemes intended for the welfare of local residents.

Expressing its view on the seriousness of the matter, the court stated, “This Court is further of the view that since the issue of infiltration has been considered an external aggression by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sarbananda Sonowal v. Union of India and Anr. (supra) and Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. (supra), this Court believes that the services of the Intelligence Bureau will also be effective in dealing with the issue.”

The court directed the state government to utilize its Special Branch for identifying infiltrators and illegal immigrants. It expressed surprise at why the Special Branch, which is equipped to gather such information, had not already been employed for this purpose.

Additionally, the court ordered the impleading of several central agencies as respondents, including the Border Security Force, UIDAI, Election Commission of India, Intelligence Bureau, and National Investigation Agency. The Intelligence Bureau was specifically directed to submit a report on the issue in a sealed cover.

In conclusion, the court’s directives reflect its concern over the alleged demographic changes and its intent to address the issue of illegal immigration in the state. The case has been listed for further hearing on August 22, 2024.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Dhanbad Judge's Death: Jharkhand High Court Asks CBI to Probe Injury Angle Dhanbad Judge's Death: Jharkhand High Court Asks CBI to Probe Injury Angle

The judge was struck by an autorickshaw with a passenger in the front seat, as well as the driver. A motorcyclist is also seen following the autorickshaw that saw the injured judge fall to the ground. Jharkhand High Court, Jharkhand High Court chief justice, Jharkhand High Court judgement, Jharkhand High Court order, CBI

Supreme Court Collegium approves new Chief Justices for five key High Courts in India [Read Recommendations] Supreme Court Collegium approves new Chief Justices for five key High Courts in India [Read Recommendations]

The Supreme Court Collegium approves new Chief Justices for Allahabad, Jharkhand, Gauhati, Punjab & Haryana, and Rajasthan High Courts. Read about the appointments.

'Arbitrary, impermissible,' SC quashes HC's resolution raising aggregate cut off marks on district judges appointment [Read Judgment] 'Arbitrary, impermissible,' SC quashes HC's resolution raising aggregate cut off marks on district judges appointment [Read Judgment]

SC overturns Jharkhand HC's post-exam 50% cut-off for judge candidates, calling it arbitrary and enforcing no mid-process rule changes.

Jharkhand High Court issues notice to ED in Hemant Soren's plea challenging arrest Jharkhand High Court issues notice to ED in Hemant Soren's plea challenging arrest

Jharkhand HC will hear Hemant Sorens plea challenging EDs arrest on February 27.

TRENDING NEWS

wifes-domestic-violence-complaint-filed-after-divorce-petition-amounts-to-fresh-cruelty-condonation-cannot-bar-relief-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Domestic Violence Complaint Filed After Divorce Petition Amounts to Fresh Cruelty; Condonation Cannot Bar Relief: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC grants divorce, holds wife’s post-petition DV complaint amounts to fresh cruelty; condonation cannot bar relief.

30 March, 2026 05:15 PM
daughter-in-law-not-legally-obligated-to-maintain-parents-in-law-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Not Legally Obligated to Maintain Parents-in-Law: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules daughter-in-law not liable to maintain parents-in-law under BNSS; moral obligation not legally enforceable.

30 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email