38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Judges have no business to give interviews to news channels: Supreme Court

By LawStreet News Network      25 April, 2023 09:07 PM      0 Comments
Judges have no buisness to give interviews to news channels: SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said that sitting judges have no business giving interviews to news channels on matters pending before them.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha came down heavily upon a sitting Calcutta High Court judge, Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay for giving interview to a news channel, ABP Ananda in connection with Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee, even though a case concerning the politician was being heard by the judge.

"Judges have no business to be granting interviews to television or whatever channels on matters which are pending before them," the bench said.

Taking up Banerjee's plea, the bench asked, "How can they give an interview?"

"The judge is speaking about the petitioner in these terms in the interview, he is clearly disabled from participating anymore," the bench added.

The court said if the judge concerned have given an interview, he could not hear the case concerned.

The bench sought a report from the Calcutta High Court, saying the Registrar General of high court is directed to personally verify from the judge as to whether he had been interviewed and, in that event, clarify.

The court directed the Registrar General to file an affidavit before Friday.

Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, for his part, said it is a huge scam.

The bench, however, clarified that it is not touching the investigation in the scam and the court will not pass any order which will preclude a proper investigation into the case.

"The question is whether, a judge giving an interview and expressing himself about a political personality like this, the chief justice should assign the matter to somebody else. We have told you in advance, why we are concerned about it," the bench told Raju.

Banerjee challenged the high court's order of April 13 for questioning him by the CBI and the ED. The transcript of the judge's interview was submitted to the court.

On April 17, the top court had stayed a Calcutta High Court order permitting the CBI and ED to question Banerjee in the matter of allegations made by expelled youth Trinamool Congress leader Kuntal Ghosh that the central agency sleuths are putting pressure on him to name Banerjee in the multi-crore scam in recruitment of teaching and non-teaching staff in state-run schools in West Bengal.

Justice Gangopadhyay passed the order on April 13 on a plea made by the ED alleging that Ghosh arrested in the primary teachers recruitment scam had made a complaint with the local police against the ED and the CBI officers.

The high court said it is a matter to be enquired and investigated whether Kuntal Ghosh took the cue from the public speech of Abhishek Banerjee for which both of them can be interrogated both by ED and by CBI and such interrogation should be made soon.

The judge had also said if the agencies did not question Banerjee, West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee's nephew within a short time, it would compelled to pass certain orders, which may be unsavory to them.
 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email