38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, March 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Judges have no business to give interviews to news channels: Supreme Court

By LawStreet News Network      25 April, 2023 09:07 PM      0 Comments
Judges have no buisness to give interviews to news channels: SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said that sitting judges have no business giving interviews to news channels on matters pending before them.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha came down heavily upon a sitting Calcutta High Court judge, Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay for giving interview to a news channel, ABP Ananda in connection with Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee, even though a case concerning the politician was being heard by the judge.

"Judges have no business to be granting interviews to television or whatever channels on matters which are pending before them," the bench said.

Taking up Banerjee's plea, the bench asked, "How can they give an interview?"

"The judge is speaking about the petitioner in these terms in the interview, he is clearly disabled from participating anymore," the bench added.

The court said if the judge concerned have given an interview, he could not hear the case concerned.

The bench sought a report from the Calcutta High Court, saying the Registrar General of high court is directed to personally verify from the judge as to whether he had been interviewed and, in that event, clarify.

The court directed the Registrar General to file an affidavit before Friday.

Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, for his part, said it is a huge scam.

The bench, however, clarified that it is not touching the investigation in the scam and the court will not pass any order which will preclude a proper investigation into the case.

"The question is whether, a judge giving an interview and expressing himself about a political personality like this, the chief justice should assign the matter to somebody else. We have told you in advance, why we are concerned about it," the bench told Raju.

Banerjee challenged the high court's order of April 13 for questioning him by the CBI and the ED. The transcript of the judge's interview was submitted to the court.

On April 17, the top court had stayed a Calcutta High Court order permitting the CBI and ED to question Banerjee in the matter of allegations made by expelled youth Trinamool Congress leader Kuntal Ghosh that the central agency sleuths are putting pressure on him to name Banerjee in the multi-crore scam in recruitment of teaching and non-teaching staff in state-run schools in West Bengal.

Justice Gangopadhyay passed the order on April 13 on a plea made by the ED alleging that Ghosh arrested in the primary teachers recruitment scam had made a complaint with the local police against the ED and the CBI officers.

The high court said it is a matter to be enquired and investigated whether Kuntal Ghosh took the cue from the public speech of Abhishek Banerjee for which both of them can be interrogated both by ED and by CBI and such interrogation should be made soon.

The judge had also said if the agencies did not question Banerjee, West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee's nephew within a short time, it would compelled to pass certain orders, which may be unsavory to them.
 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-quashes-criminal-case-against-kahaani-director-sujoy-ghosh-holds-summoning-order-passed-without-application-of-mind
Trending CelebStreet
SC Quashes Criminal Case Against ‘Kahaani’ Director Sujoy Ghosh, Holds Summoning Order Passed Without Application of Mind [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes criminal case against ‘Kahaani’ director Sujoy Ghosh, holding the summoning order was passed without proper application of mind.

21 March, 2026 10:37 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-cancels-anticipatory-bail-in-scst-atrocities-case-says-police-reconciliation-cannot-bar-fir-for-criminal-acts
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Atrocities Case, Says Police Reconciliation Cannot Bar FIR for Criminal Acts [Read Order]

Supreme Court cancels anticipatory bail in SC/ST Act case, holding that police attempts at reconciliation cannot prevent registration of FIR for criminal acts.

16 March, 2026 02:44 PM
telangana-hc-sets-aside-dna-test-order-in-matrimonial-dispute-rules-child-cannot-be-used-as-pawn-to-prove-adultery
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC Sets Aside DNA Test Order in Matrimonial Dispute; Rules Child Cannot Be Used as Pawn to Prove Adultery [Read Order]

Telangana High Court sets aside DNA test order in matrimonial dispute, holding a child cannot be used as a pawn to prove adultery against the mother.

16 March, 2026 05:35 PM
eviction-suit-over-petrol-pump-property-rejected-by-calcutta-hc-holds-dispute-commercial-in-nature-non-commercial-division-had-no-jurisdiction
Trending Judiciary
Eviction Suit Over Petrol Pump Property Rejected by Calcutta HC; Holds Dispute Commercial in Nature, Non-Commercial Division Had No Jurisdiction [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court rejects eviction suit over petrol pump property, holding the dispute commercial in nature and outside the jurisdiction of the non-commercial division.

16 March, 2026 06:00 PM
child-victims-in-pocso-cases-cannot-be-repeatedly-summoned-for-bail-hearings-or-evidence-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Victims in POCSO Cases Cannot Be Repeatedly Summoned for Bail Hearings or Evidence: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court rules child victims in POCSO cases cannot be repeatedly summoned for bail hearings or evidence, consolidates safeguards for vulnerable witnesses.

16 March, 2026 06:24 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email