38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Kerala HC Rejects Plea to Cancel ‘India Gate’ Trademark, Cites Jurisdiction Bar [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      01 November, 2025 05:04 PM      0 Comments
Kerala HC Rejects Plea to Cancel India Gate Trademark Cites Jurisdiction Bar

Kerala: The Kerala High Court has dismissed a petition filed under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking cancellation of the registered trademark “INDIA GATE” belonging to KRBL Limited, holding that the case was not maintainable for want of territorial jurisdiction and for being premature.

Justice M.A. Abdul Hakhim delivered the judgment on October 27, 2025, in SPJC No. 2 of 2025, filed by PAS Agro Foods, a Kerala-based firm, against KRBL Limited and the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (CGPDTM). The petitioner sought cancellation of the “INDIA GATE” mark under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957, contending that KRBL’s registration was invalid.

The Court noted that KRBL Limited had acquired the “INDIA GATE” trademark through a Deed of Assignment dated August 6, 2019, from the original proprietor, Ram Pratap, who had obtained registration from the Trade Marks Registry, New Delhi, in 1993. The company had already initiated C.S. (Comm) No. 78 of 2025 before the District Commercial Court, Tis Hazari, New Delhi, alleging infringement against the petitioner, and had secured a temporary injunction on January 21, 2025.

The respondent challenged the maintainability of the petition, arguing that only the High Court exercising appellate jurisdiction over the Trade Marks Registry where the mark was registered — in this case, the Delhi High Court — had jurisdiction to entertain a rectification plea. Accepting this contention, Justice Hakhim held that Section 57 of the Act must be read with Rule 4 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, which fixes jurisdiction with the High Court having authority over the appropriate Trade Marks Registry.

The Court reasoned that permitting multiple High Courts to entertain rectification petitions based on the “dynamic effect” of trademark use would lead to “jurisdictional chaos” and conflicting judgments. Referring to the Madras High Court’s decision in M/s Woltop India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and the Delhi High Court’s ruling in The Hershey Company v. Dilip Kumar Bacha, the Court concluded that the Kerala High Court lacked jurisdiction since the “INDIA GATE” mark was registered in New Delhi.

The Court further found that the case was premature, as no issue regarding the validity of the registration had yet been framed by the Delhi District Court under Section 124(1)(ii) of the Trade Marks Act. Relying on Patel Field Marshal Agencies v. P.M. Diesels Ltd. [(2018) 2 SCC 112], the Bench reiterated that rectification proceedings can only be initiated once the trial court records a prima facie finding on invalidity.

Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the Special Jurisdiction Case as not maintainable.

Case Title: PAS Agro Foods vs. KRBL Limited & Ors.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Only a Woman Knows How Difficult it is to Balance Motherhood and Career' : Kerala High Court Reinstates Woman Fired for Availing Maternity Leave 'Only a Woman Knows How Difficult it is to Balance Motherhood and Career' : Kerala High Court Reinstates Woman Fired for Availing Maternity Leave

"The mother's constant proximity to the child has been scientifically proven to be absolutely irreplaceable, which is why, among other things, maternity leave provisions are now internationally accepted," it further added. Kerala high court, Kerala high court order, Kerala high court judgement, Kerala high court chief justice, Motherhood and Career

Kerala HC Quashes 498A Dowry Harassment Case Against Live-In Partner, Citing Lack of Relative Status [Read Order] Kerala HC Quashes 498A Dowry Harassment Case Against Live-In Partner, Citing Lack of Relative Status [Read Order]

Read about a recent judgment by the Kerala High Court that quashed a dowry harassment case against a woman in a live-in relationship. The court ruled that she couldn't be considered a relative under Section 498A of the IPC, highlighting the importance of precise legal definitions.

Watching porn on mobile: Kerala HC highlights importance of mother cooked meals, outdoor sports [Read Order] Watching porn on mobile: Kerala HC highlights importance of mother cooked meals, outdoor sports [Read Order]

Kerala High Court emphasizes the importance of outdoor sports, home-cooked meals, and parental supervision, discouraging the gifting of mobile phones to minors. Learn why the court quashed a case related to private porn viewing and the need for responsible parenting.

Lakshadweep MP Mohammed Faizal Disqualified from Lok Sabha After Conviction Suspension Plea Rejected by Kerala High Court [Read Notice] Lakshadweep MP Mohammed Faizal Disqualified from Lok Sabha After Conviction Suspension Plea Rejected by Kerala High Court [Read Notice]

Lakshadweep MP Mohammed Faizal PP faces disqualification from Lok Sabha as Kerala High Court rejects plea to suspend his conviction in an attempt to murder case. Get the latest updates on his legal battle.

TRENDING NEWS

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM

TOP STORIES

regulating-hate-restricting-speech-an-analysis-of-the-karnataka-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes-bill-2025
Trending Executive
Regulating Hate, Restricting Speech ? An Analysis Of The Karnataka Hate Speech And Hate Crimes Bill, 2025

Analysis of Karnataka’s Hate Speech Bill, 2025, examining vague definitions, harsh penalties, executive powers, and its impact on free speech.

04 January, 2026 12:48 AM
if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email