38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Larger bench of Karnataka HC to hear pleas against withdrawal of consent for CBI probe against DK Shivakumar

By Rintu Mariam Biju      05 January, 2024 07:49 PM      0 Comments
Larger Bench of Karnataka HC to hear petitions against withdrawal of consent for CBI probe against DK Shivakumar

BENGALURU: The challenge to the Karnataka government, led by the Congress party, to withdraw permission for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar should be heard by a division bench, according to a single judge bench of the Karnataka High Court. 

Justice Krishna Dixit stated that are several larger questions of importance arising in the matter. 

Basangouda Patil Yatnal, a BJP MLA, and the CBI, which has now appealed to the State's decision to revoke permission for the corruption inquiry against Shivakumar, were the two petitions that the Court was considering.

In order to decide whether the case should be considered by a division bench, Justice Dixit today directed that for the cases to be placed before Chief Justice PB Varale. 

It all goes back to September 25, 2019 when the Karnataka government, which was then led by the BJP, gave the CBI permission to file a first information report (FIR) against Shivakumar in connection with claims of corruption and the possession of disproportionate assets.

Shivakumar subsequently challenged the same in a writ petition before a High Court. After the case was rejected on April 4, 2023, Shivakumar filed an appeal before a division bench.

In the meanwhile, the Karnataka cabinet moved to withdraw consent for a CBI investigation against DK Shivakumar in the disproportionate assets case, calling the decision illegal. The cabinet deemed the previous BJP government's consent to the CBI to investigate the case against Mr Shivakumar was not as per law and decided to withdraw the sanction. The state opposition parties - the BJP and the JDS vehemently protested the decision. 

Shivakumar was then granted permission by the Division Bench of the High Court in November 2023 to withdraw his plea, which had become infructuous because the CBI's permission to look into case was revoked. Aggrieved, Yatnal moved the High Court. Recently, even the CBI moved the court questioning the present state governments decision.



Share this article:

About:

Rintu Mariam Biju graduated from the National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi after comp...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Karnataka High Court: Cabinet Rank Status Not Equivalent to Ministerial Position [Read Order] Karnataka High Court: Cabinet Rank Status Not Equivalent to Ministerial Position [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court clarifies that Cabinet rank status does not equate to ministerial position, dismissing a PIL challenging political appointments to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah.

Karnataka High Court Grants Protection to Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary Amid Fake News Controversy Karnataka High Court Grants Protection to Journalist Sudhir Chaudhary Amid Fake News Controversy

Karnataka High Court protects journalist Sudhir Chaudhary and Aaj Tak from coercive action over alleged 'fake news' about Karnataka government's minority scheme. Get the latest updates on this legal battle.

Ganeshotsav at Idgah Maidan: High Court Rejects Anjuman-E-Islam's Plea Against Ganesh Idol Installation Ganeshotsav at Idgah Maidan: High Court Rejects Anjuman-E-Islam's Plea Against Ganesh Idol Installation

Karnataka High Court rejects Anjuman-E-Islam's plea against Ganesh idol installation at Idgah Maidan in Hubballi. Get the latest updates on the legal battle and permissions for Ganesha festivities.

Woman living in adultery cannot claim maintenance: Karnataka High Court [Read Order] Woman living in adultery cannot claim maintenance: Karnataka High Court [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules that a woman engaged in adultery cannot claim maintenance, stating her dishonesty as a key factor.

TRENDING NEWS

hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

TOP STORIES

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM
sc-recalls-order-against-hc-judge-on-taking-away-criminal-roster
Trending Judiciary
SC recalls order against HC judge on taking away criminal roster

SC recalls order removing HC judge from criminal roster, cites institutional dignity; says directions weren’t to embarrass but to uphold judicial integrity.

08 August, 2025 12:43 PM
sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email