38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Lawyers Cannot Be Forced to Abstain from Work Amid 'Black Day' Protest: Calcutta HC [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      29 June, 2024 05:59 PM      0 Comments
Lawyers Cannot Be Forced to Abstain from Work Amid Black Day Protest Calcutta HC

Kolkatta: The Calcutta High Court has delivered a significant order ruling that a Bar Council resolution calling for a Black Day and work abstention cannot be treated as binding on lawyers, protecting their right to appear in court.

In an order passed on June 28, 2024, Justice Shampa Sarkar addressed a writ petition challenging a resolution by the Bar Council of West Bengal to observe July 1, 2024, as a Black Day in protest against three new laws.

The court observed that it is a settled provision of law that no one can be compelled to observe a strike or cease work, emphasizing that lawyers discharge a public function for litigants. The court ruled, It is a settled position of law that no one can be compelled to observe a strike or cease work. Lawyers discharge a public function for the litigants. Thus, this resolution of the Bar Council of West Bengal shall not be treated as a mandate on the learned advocates to abstain from work.

Expressing concern for lawyers rights and litigants interests, the court stated that willing advocates are entitled to appear before courts across West Bengal and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands on July 1. It also prohibited any coercive measures or disciplinary action against lawyers who choose to work.

Further, the court clarified that the rallies proposed by the Bar Council should be treated as requests to Bar Associations, not mandates. It allowed the Bar Council to file an affidavit-in-opposition within three weeks to address the challenge to its authority.

Advocate Lokenath Chatterjee appeared for the petitioner, whereas Senior Advocate Saptangshu Basu appeared for the Bar Council.

The court also noted that the petitioner had challenged the Bar Councils authority to call for such strikes, relying on the Supreme Courts decision in Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs. Union of India (2003). The learned senior advocate for the Bar Council submitted that since the authority of the Bar Council of West Bengal to call such strikes and rallies was under challenge, some opportunity should be given to the Bar Council to file their affidavit-in-opposition.

The court allowed the filing of such an affidavit-in-opposition within three weeks, and any further reply thereto, if any, to be filed within two weeks thereafter.

In conclusion, the court held that lawyers discharge a public function for litigants. Thus, the resolution of the Bar Council of West Bengal shall not be treated as a mandate for the learned advocates to abstain from work.

 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Birbhum Massacre: NHRC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs State Gov To Submit Detailed Report Within 4 Weeks Birbhum Massacre: NHRC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs State Gov To Submit Detailed Report Within 4 Weeks

According to reports, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday met the families of the victims and announced Rs 2 lakh compensation for rebuilding the scorched homes. Promising jobs to ten families affected by the violence, Banerjee added that she would ensure "speedy justice".

Supreme Court Rejects West Bengal's Plea Against CBI Probe in Linked Municipality and Teachers' Recruitment Scam Supreme Court Rejects West Bengal's Plea Against CBI Probe in Linked Municipality and Teachers' Recruitment Scam

Supreme Court dismisses West Bengal's plea against CBI probe into municipality recruitment scam linked with teachers' recruitment irregularities. Abhishek Banerjee, TMC MP, faces setback as court refuses interference.

Calcutta High Court conducts late-evening hearing, orders release of lawyer arrested inside court [Read Order] Calcutta High Court conducts late-evening hearing, orders release of lawyer arrested inside court [Read Order]

After holding a late-evening hearing due to unprecedented events, a division bench of the Calcutta High Court stayed an order which directed a lawyers arrest inside the court on charges of contempt of court.

Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6] Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6]

A weekly round-up of the top stories from the Supreme Court of India and High Courts across the country summed up in a 3-minute read.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email