38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Lawyers for Justice' condemns malicious attack on judiciary in Calcutta HC by TMC advocates

By LawStreet News Network      12 January, 2023 09:09 PM      0 Comments
'Lawyers for Justice' condemns malicious attack on judiciary in Calcutta HC by TMC advocates

NEW DELHI: Members of 'Lawyers for Justice' has strongly condemned the malicious attack on judiciary in Calcutta High Court, allegedly by advocates owing allegiance to ruling Trinamool Congress.

They decided to meet the Chairman, Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra and submit a memorandum demanding strong actions immediately in the interest of Justice.

They decided to ask from BCI chairman Mishra to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the advocates guilty of such professional misconduct at the earliest.

"The political anarchists in West Bengal have not even left the sacred institution of Judiciary. The malicious attacks on Judges including deeply personal attacks present a grave danger to the Indian Judicial System," it said in a statement.

On January 9, 2023, Justice Rajasekhar Mantha of Calcutta High Court had to leave his courtroom after TMC lawyers laid siege before court room number 13 to protest against some of his earlier orders.

"The ensuing chaos forced Justice Mantha to exit his courtroom. Miscreants have also pasted posters against Justice Mantha within the court premises and outside his Jodhpur Park residence. Justice Mantha faced the ire of several lawyers affiliated with the ruling party Trinamool Congress (TMC), who gathered outside his courtroom and prevented him from continuing with proceedings. Pamphlets describing Justice Mantha as a "disgrace in the name of the judiciary" were seen pasted on walls near the court premises and the judge's residence," they said.

Notably, in December, 2022, Justice Mantha had given protection to Shuvendu Adhikari, the Leader of Opposition, directing the state police not to register any more FIRs against him without the High Courts permission.

Adhikari had then filed a plea alleging that 26 FIRs had been registered against him in different police stations to prevent him from performing his duties as MLA

Earlier, Justice Mantha had removed the protection granted to Maneka Gambhir, the sister-in-law of Abhishek Banerjee, in a money laundering case.

On Tuesday, Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay criticised intimidation of judges. He had also faced similar protests in April, 2022 after he ordered a CBI probe into the teachers recruitment scam in government schools in West Bengal.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

those-who-dont-believe-in-gurus-are-rascals-madras-hc-judge-sparks-row
Trending Judiciary
“Those Who Don’t Believe in Gurus Are Rascals”: Madras HC Judge Sparks Row

Madras HC Justice G.R. Swaminathan’s remarks on non-believers spark nationwide debate as impeachment motion and judicial conduct concerns resurface.

24 February, 2026 11:49 AM
ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email