38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madras HC Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Publisher Over Book Allegedly Targeting Sitting Judge [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      08 January, 2026 07:27 PM      0 Comments
Madras HC Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Publisher Over Book Allegedly Targeting Sitting Judge

Chennai: The Madras High Court has initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against a publisher and directed the police to take immediate action to prevent the release and circulation of a book allegedly containing highly derogatory and abusive content targeting a sitting Judge of the Court.

The Division Bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan passed the order on January 7, 2026, on a writ petition filed by P. Naveenprasad, highlighting that Keezhaikaatru Publishers, the fifth respondent, was planning to release the book on January 8, 2026, at the opening of the Chennai Book Fair.

The Court noted that the matter was of “serious concern” and required emergent attention. The petitioner stated in his affidavit that the publisher and persons associated with it were going to release a book bearing a title containing the specific name of a sitting Judge of the Court in “extremely derogatory language.”

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that a copy of the title page/front page of the book was being circulated in the media, including on social media, and placed the same on record for the Court’s perusal.

Upon examining the document, the Court observed:

“Having perused the said document, which is said to be the title page/front page of the book proposed to be released/published on 08.01.2026 at the opening of the Chennai Book Fair, at once, it would show that the pictorial representation, the caricature and the expressions/words used are not only highly derogatory, but virtually abusive. The pictorial representation directly points out the face and name of a sitting Judge of this Court.”

The Additional Solicitor General of India and the Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State submitted that if this was to be the title of a book, it was “apparently derogatory, abusive and highly contemptuous, as it tends to scandalise the Court and erode public confidence in the system.”

The Court further noted that the title of the book indicated that it was proposed to be released on January 8, 2026, from Shop Nos. 172 and 173 at the Chennai Book Fair. The fifth respondent publisher had been allotted Shop No. 173.

The Court held:

“On the face of it, the proposed release of the book, as titled and shown in the petition, is highly derogatory and abusive, crosses all limits, and needs to be dealt with by the Court with stern hands.”

The Bench directed the State counsel representing the police officials (Respondents 2, 3 and 4) to “take immediate and effective action to ensure that no such book having such pictorial representation, statements, caricature or contents tending to scandalise the Court/Judge is allowed to be published and circulated.”

The Court specifically directed that appropriate action be taken by the police authorities, “including ensuring that such scandalous publications do not take place, which may include seizure of pictorial representations and contents of the nature stated above, through any means, including electronic media.”

Significantly, the Court stated:

“On the basis of the material which we find in the petition, we are inclined to initiate suo motu criminal contempt against the fifth respondent.”

The Court issued emergent notice to the fifth respondent, including private notice to be served at Stall No. 173 at the Chennai Book Fair, making the notice returnable in three weeks. The Court also directed the State counsel to submit a report on compliance with the directions on the next hearing date.

The matter has been listed for hearing on January 28, 2026. The Court further directed that the order be uploaded on the same day, i.e., January 7, 2026.

Case Title: P. Naveenprasad v. Home Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu and Others

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Mediation Can Effectively Resolve Disputes Governing the LGBTQ Community; it Ensures Relationships are Preserved, Privacy is Guarded and Parties are Heard' : Justice Anand Venkatesh 'Mediation Can Effectively Resolve Disputes Governing the LGBTQ Community; it Ensures Relationships are Preserved, Privacy is Guarded and Parties are Heard' : Justice Anand Venkatesh

them, acknowledge their presence, and make room for them. It will not work if you approach it in the traditional manner. Consider them as human beings; that is all they are requesting, Justice Anand Venkatesh finally remarked. LGBTQ Community, LGBTQ Community flag, LGBTQ Community in delhi, Madras high court, Madras high court order

TN Medical Council declares change of gender identity of LGBTQIA+ as misconduct [Read Notification] TN Medical Council declares change of gender identity of LGBTQIA+ as misconduct [Read Notification]

The notification was issued in compliance with the directions issued by the Madras High Court in its July 8, 2022, order.

Madras High Court Directs Tamil Nadu Government to Ensure Quota for Transgenders in Local Body Elections [Read Order] Madras High Court Directs Tamil Nadu Government to Ensure Quota for Transgenders in Local Body Elections [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs Tamil Nadu government to provide reservations for transgender individuals in local body elections, aiming for inclusion and democratic participation. The court emphasizes the need to eliminate social stigma and uphold the rights of transgender individuals.

Anti Corruption sleuths acted like "puppets in The Muppet Show", HC notice to ex TN CM in disproportionate assets case [Read Order] Anti Corruption sleuths acted like "puppets in The Muppet Show", HC notice to ex TN CM in disproportionate assets case [Read Order]

Madras High Court questions integrity of MP/MLA case judgments, criticizes anti-corruption sleuths acting as 'puppets' in political show. Examination of corruption cases against lawmakers amid regime changes.

TRENDING NEWS

nobody-should-believe-anybody-before-marriage-sc-cautions-against-pre-marital-physical-relationships
Trending Judiciary
“Nobody Should Believe Anybody Before Marriage”: SC Cautions Against Pre-Marital Physical Relationships

Supreme Court cautions young adults on pre-marital relationships in a bail plea over rape on false promise of marriage; suggests mediation.

17 February, 2026 04:47 PM
allahabad-hc-refers-advocate-for-criminal-contempt-after-alleged-scandalous-remarks-during-bail-hearing
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refers Advocate for Criminal Contempt After Alleged Scandalous Remarks During Bail Hearing [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refers advocate for criminal contempt over alleged scandalous remarks during a bail hearing in Uttar Pradesh.

17 February, 2026 05:15 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-notifies-2026-guidelines-for-senior-advocate-designation-scraps-point-system-and-interviews
Trending Judiciary
SC Notifies 2026 Guidelines for Senior Advocate Designation; Scraps Point System and Interviews [Read Notification]

Supreme Court notifies 2026 guidelines for Senior Advocate designation, abolishing point system and interviews; introduces holistic evaluation process.

12 February, 2026 04:00 PM
sunjay-kapur-will-dispute-priya-sachdev-files-application-to-dismiss-mil-rani-kapurs-family-trust-fraud-allegations
Trending Judiciary
Sunjay Kapur Will Dispute: Priya Sachdev Files Application To Dismiss MIL Rani Kapur’s Family Trust Fraud Allegations

Delhi HC issues notice on Priya Kapur’s plea to dismiss Rani Kapur’s suit alleging a fraudulent family trust to divert late Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

12 February, 2026 04:32 PM
girlfriend-cannot-be-deemed-relative-of-husband-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Girlfriend Cannot Be Deemed ‘Relative’ of Husband: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes case against girlfriend, holds she is not a “relative” under Section 498A IPC and cannot be charged with stalking under Section 354D.

12 February, 2026 04:46 PM
allahabad-hc-stays-section-174-a-ipc-proceedings-against-mla-abbas-ansari
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Stays Section 174-A IPC Proceedings Against MLA Abbas Ansari [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court stayed proceedings against MLA Abbas Ansari under Section 174-A IPC over alleged non-compliance with proclamation proceedings.

12 February, 2026 05:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email