38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 18, 2024
Judiciary

Madras HC Issues Notice to Union Against the conduct of Online Classes Amid Lockdown, points out Absence of Requisite Guidelines Under the IT Act, 2000 to Allow it

By Tanurag Ghosh      17 June, 2020 07:36 PM      0 Comments
Madras HC Issues Notice to Union Against the conduct of Online Classes Amid Lockdown, points out Absence of Requisite Guidelines Under the IT Act, 2000 to Allow it

Tamil Nadu is the second worst-hit state by the COVID-19 pandemic. With more than 48,000 cases, the daily movement of the entire state population has come to a grinding halt. The government is taking measures to ensure that the outbreak is controlled with an imposition of a strict lockdown in the major city of Chennai also been ordered. 

At such a time, essential activities have been consistently trudging along. One of the most of them, i.e., the dispensation of education has shifted entirely to online platforms. Schools are now using methods of videoconferencing to make sure students attend classes. However, the underlying requirement for access to the internet and its contents by young children certainly poses several issues with regard to safety and exposure.

Taking cognizance of this, the government of Karnataka has ordered that online classes should not take place for children in grades LKG to V. Other state governments have also constituted committees to deliberate upon a solution for this situation. 

With regards to Tamil Nadu, a petition was filed in the High Court of Madras regarding regulation for online classes. The petition contended that under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, conducting online classes in the absence of laws that keep a check on the material being circulated among the students is unwarranted. It also claimed that conducting classes without the requisite laws is not congenial for the purpose of education.

It contended that there exist grey areas in the rules, namely-

1) Information Technology Act. 2000 

2) Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Interception, Monitoring, and Decryption of Information) Rules, 2009

3) Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data of Information) Rules, 2011

The Bench comprising of Justice Vineet Kothari and Justice R Suresh Kumar issued a notice to the Union government, Ministry of Information and Technology, Computer Emergency Response Team, and other authorities considering it a matter of enormous public importance. 

The Bench, however, did not grant any interim relief to the petitioner and consequently allowed schools and colleges to conduct online classes for the time being.

The Court remarked:

"There are no guidelines restricting or checking the material which pops up on the screen which may not be congenial for the education of the students, who are constrained to undergo Online Education."

The next hearing on the matter will take place on 25th June 2020, where the union government would provide a reasonable solution and a final decision will be made regarding online classes, which have become the new normal in the pandemic.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

zero-fir-heres-all-you-need-to-know
Trending Know The Law
Zero FIR: Here’s all you need to know!

Understanding Zero FIR: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 154 allows FIR at any police station. E-FIR under Section 173 ensures efficient crime reporting in India.

17 July, 2024 01:25 PM
judicial-activist-ashwini-upadhyay-asks-sc-to-declare-amendment-to-preamble-as-unconstitutional
Trending Judiciary
Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay asks SC to declare amendment to Preamble as unconstitutional

Judicial activist Ashwini Upadhyay petitions SC to declare the 42nd Amendment to the Preamble, which added "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity," as unconstitutional.

17 July, 2024 05:14 PM

TOP STORIES

bombay-high-court-denies-interim-relief-in-plea-against-1-year-pan-masala-ban
Trending Judiciary
Bombay High Court denies interim relief in plea against 1 year Pan Masala Ban [Read Order]

Bombay High Court denies interim relief to petitioners challenging the 1-year ban on pan masala, citing arguable questions and ongoing similar cases.

12 July, 2024 10:00 AM
sc-collegium-recommends-appointment-of-chief-justices-of-eight-high-courts
Trending Judiciary
SC Collegium recommends appointment of Chief Justices of eight High Courts [Read Order]

SC Collegium recommends appointments of Chief Justices for Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Madras, and Meghalaya High Courts.

12 July, 2024 10:55 AM
sc-orders-interim-bail-for-kejriwal-in-ed-case-refers-issues-on-arrest-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC orders interim bail for Kejriwal in ED case, refers issues on arrest to larger bench

SC grants interim bail to Kejriwal in ED case, refers arrest issues to larger bench; AAP leader remains in jail due to separate CBI arrest in liquor scam.

12 July, 2024 11:21 AM
hathras-incident-sc-refuses-to-consider-pil-on-inquiry-adequate-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Hathras incident: SC refuses to consider PIL on inquiry, adequate compensation

Supreme Court declines PIL on Hathras stampede inquiry and compensation, directs petitioner to approach High Court for addressing the issue.

12 July, 2024 01:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email