38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 29, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Madras High Court Grants Bail to Jaffer Sadiq, Mohamed Saleem in ED Money Laundering Case Over International Drug Proceeds [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      23 April, 2025 12:14 PM      0 Comments
Madras High Court Grants Bail to Jaffer Sadiq Mohamed Saleem in ED Money Laundering Case Over International Drug Proceeds

Chennai: The Madras High Court has granted bail to Jaffer Sadiq and Mohamed Saleem, who were arrested by the Enforcement Directorate in connection with a money laundering case, emphasizing that prolonged pre-trial detention violates constitutional rights.
Justice Sunder Mohan delivered the order on April 21, 2025, after considering the petitions filed by both accused, who had been in custody since mid-2024.

The court addressed the matter involving two criminal original petitions filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The court noted, “Both the accused were involved in the process connected with the proceeds of crime, including concealment, possession, acquisition or use, and projecting or claiming it as untainted property.”

The prosecution argued that the accused had substantial unexplained cash deposits in their accounts and had purchased properties using proceeds from drug trafficking operations that extended beyond India to countries including Malaysia, New Zealand, and Australia.
The petitioners’ advocates submitted that the accused had already been granted bail in the predicate offences, the investigation had been completed, and the properties allegedly acquired through proceeds of crime had been attached.

Addressing specific concerns regarding long incarceration, the court observed, “Prolonged pre-trial detention is anathema to the Constitution, besides being in violation of basic human rights.”

While referring to various precedents, the court stated, “The observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court remind the High Courts and the trial courts of certain fundamental principles: that bail is the rule and jail is an exception; that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment.”
After considering various factors, the court held that further incarceration of the petitioners pending trial would violate their rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the court expressed its inclination to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to conditions to ensure their presence during trial.

In a specific directive, the court ordered: “Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum.”
The court also imposed conditions including the surrender of passports, regular appearance before the trial court, and a prohibition on contacting witnesses or tampering with evidence.

Senior Counsels Mr. Abudu Kumar Rajarathinam and Mr. Sri Charan Rangarajan appeared for the petitioners, while Mr. A.R.L. Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor General of India, assisted by Mr. N. Ramesh, Special Public Prosecutor, appeared for the Enforcement Directorate.

Case Title: Jaffer Sadiq v. The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Social media users have to be careful of consequences before forwarding message: Supreme Court Social media users have to be careful of consequences before forwarding message: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court's dismissal of a plea by S Ve Shekher highlights the need for social media users to be cautious about the impact and consequences before forwarding messages. The case involved derogatory remarks against women journalists shared on Facebook in 2018.

Madras High Court Directs Tamil Nadu Government to Ensure Quota for Transgenders in Local Body Elections [Read Order] Madras High Court Directs Tamil Nadu Government to Ensure Quota for Transgenders in Local Body Elections [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs Tamil Nadu government to provide reservations for transgender individuals in local body elections, aiming for inclusion and democratic participation. The court emphasizes the need to eliminate social stigma and uphold the rights of transgender individuals.

RSS route march case: Supreme Court refuses to issue notice on TN govt plea RSS route march case: Supreme Court refuses to issue notice on TN govt plea

Discover the latest developments in the RSS route march case as the Supreme Court refuses to issue notice to the Tamil Nadu government. Get insights into the Madras High Court's summoning of officials and the legal challenges surrounding RSS's route marches in the state.

"No need to monitor" hundial opening of Hindu temples, Tamil Nadu HRCE Commissioner tells Madras High Court "No need to monitor" hundial opening of Hindu temples, Tamil Nadu HRCE Commissioner tells Madras High Court

Opposing the petitioner Shri Rangarajan Narasimhan's prayer for appointment of retired IPS/IAS officers, retired Judges and persons of high integrity in the District Committee for each district to monitor the opening of hundials (collection boxes) of Hindu temples, the Commissioner has told the Madras High Court that in light of the existing precautions taken during the hundial opening process, there is no need to appoint" such persons as prayed for by the petitioner. Read more on the Tamil Nadu's HRCE Commissioner's submissions here.

TRENDING NEWS

vande-mataram-at-150-constitutional-reverence-judicial-restraint-and-the-limits-of-legal-nationalism
Trending Know The Law
Vande Mataram at 150: Constitutional Reverence, Judicial Restraint, and the Limits of Legal Nationalism

At 150, Vande Mataram’s constitutional status, judicial restraint, and the limits of legal nationalism reveal India’s unresolved debate on law and reverence.

28 January, 2026 12:19 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-family-pension-for-remarried-childless-widow-of-crpf-personnel-parents-not-entitled
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Family Pension for Remarried Childless Widow of CRPF Personnel; Parents Not Entitled [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court rules that a remarried childless widow of a CRPF personnel remains entitled to family pension; dependent parents have no claim under Rule 54.

28 January, 2026 03:56 PM

TOP STORIES

national-green-tribunal-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-techies-drowning-in-waterlogged-trench
Trending Environment
National Green Tribunal Takes Suo Motu Cognisance Of Techie’s Drowning In Waterlogged Trench [Read Order]

National Green Tribunal takes suo motu cognisance of a techie’s drowning in a waterlogged trench in Noida, citing environmental lapses and violation of law.

23 January, 2026 03:20 PM
vande-mataram-at-150-constitutional-reverence-judicial-restraint-and-the-limits-of-legal-nationalism
Trending Know The Law
Vande Mataram at 150: Constitutional Reverence, Judicial Restraint, and the Limits of Legal Nationalism

At 150, Vande Mataram’s constitutional status, judicial restraint, and the limits of legal nationalism reveal India’s unresolved debate on law and reverence.

28 January, 2026 12:19 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-family-pension-for-remarried-childless-widow-of-crpf-personnel-parents-not-entitled
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Family Pension for Remarried Childless Widow of CRPF Personnel; Parents Not Entitled [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court rules that a remarried childless widow of a CRPF personnel remains entitled to family pension; dependent parents have no claim under Rule 54.

28 January, 2026 03:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email