38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Maggi Ban: SC Revives Suit Against Nestle

By LawStreet News Network      04 January, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Maggi Ban: SC Revives Suit Against Nestle

The Supreme Court on January 3, 2019, resuscitated a 640-crore class-action suit filed against Indian branch of the Swiss food giant Nestle by the government on behalf of thousands of consumers of the iconic Maggi noodles.

A Bench led by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud revived the suit filed by the Department of Consumer Affairs, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution in the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in August 2015 against Nestle India Limited on grounds of unfair trade practices, sale of defective goods and sale of Maggi Oats Noodles to the public without product approval.

The suit was filed under Section 12(1) (d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. This provision allows the Centre or a State, either in its individual capacity or as a representative of the interests of the consumers, to file a complaint in the consumer forum.

The department claimed that Nestle was liable to pay 284.55 crore along with punitive damages of 355.4 crore for gross negligence, apathy and callousness on its part. Thus, demanding a total of 639.96 crore from Nestle.

The Bench would hear the suit on the basis of a report filed by the Mysuru-based Central Food Technological Research Institute in 2016.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email