38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Meghalaya High Court Expands PIL on Cremation Facilities to Include Christian Burial Rights [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      12 May, 2025 03:07 PM      0 Comments
Meghalaya High Court Expands PIL on Cremation Facilities to Include Christian Burial Rights

Meghalaya: The Meghalaya High Court has delivered a significant order expanding the scope of an ongoing Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the construction and use of crematoria for the Khasi, Jaintia, and Hindu communities to also include the burial needs of the Christian community.

Chief Justice I.P. Mukerji and Justice W. Diengdoh passed the order after taking judicial notice of the difficulties reportedly faced by various denominations of the Christian faith in burying their dead.

Meghalaya High Court Takes Note of Christian Burial Challenges

The PIL was originally focused on the lack of cremation facilities and the reluctance of different communities to share existing ones.

Earlier, the Court had noted the State Government’s proposal to construct new crematoria, while also directing the Amicus Curiae to facilitate discussions among community representatives and district authorities. A report submitted by the Amicus Curiae indicated progress, with an agreement reached to allow crematoria to be shared through separate designated spaces for each community.

PIL on Cremation Facilities Now Covers All Religious Communities

The Court observed, “A cemetery controlled by one denomination is not allowing dead bodies of persons belonging to another denomination to be interred in the same cemetery.” It further noted that bereaved families in different parts of the State are having to travel long distances for burial services.

In response, the Court directed that the scope of the PIL be enlarged to include the Christian community. Additionally, the Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Jaintia Hills Autonomous District Council, and Garo Hills Autonomous District Council were added as party respondents to the case, and the Advocate-on-Record was instructed to amend the cause title accordingly by 15 May 2025.

The Amicus Curiae was further directed to hold meetings with the concerned District Magistrates and representatives of the Christian community to explore possible solutions, including shared burial arrangements and identification of new cemetery sites. The State was also instructed to submit a report indicating whether it has any existing or proposed plans to expand cemetery facilities for the Christian community.

Both the Amicus Curiae and the State Government are required to file their reports by 9 June 2025. The matter has been listed for further hearing on 12 June 2025.

Mr. N. Syngkon appeared as Amicus Curiae. Mr. K. Khan, Additional Advocate General, and Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang, Additional Senior Government Advocate, appeared for the State of Meghalaya.

Case Title: Re: Seng Khasi Hima Crematorium vs. State of Meghalaya

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Plea for the Status of Hindus, Niam Khasi, Niam Tynrai, and Songsarek to be heard by Meghalaya High Court Plea for the Status of Hindus, Niam Khasi, Niam Tynrai, and Songsarek to be heard by Meghalaya High Court

It also mentioned the poor facility of the state in endeavoring to eliminate inequality in status, facility, and opportunity under Article 38(2) of the Constitution. As per the latest update, the highest Court has dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the equivalent Court. Status of Hindus, Niam Khasi, Niam Tynrai, Songsarek, Meghalaya High Court

Rubbing Male Organ On Vagina Or Urethra Over Victim's Underpants Amounts To Rape: Meghalaya High Court Rubbing Male Organ On Vagina Or Urethra Over Victim's Underpants Amounts To Rape: Meghalaya High Court

The Meghalaya High Court upheld a rape conviction under Section 375(b) IPC, ruling that even partial penetration qualifies as rape. The case involved a minor victim who alleged the accused rubbed his genitalia against her underwear.

Bread And Rusk Are Different, Vat Exemption Available To Bread Can't Be Extended To Rusk: Meghalaya High Court Bread And Rusk Are Different, Vat Exemption Available To Bread Can't Be Extended To Rusk: Meghalaya High Court

The Meghalaya High Court ruled that rusk, being distinct from bread due to additional manufacturing processes, does not qualify for the VAT exemption granted to bread.

Meghalaya High Court Suggests Army To Conduct Surprise Checks On Its Vehicles To Prevent Possible Drug Trafficking Meghalaya High Court Suggests Army To Conduct Surprise Checks On Its Vehicles To Prevent Possible Drug Trafficking

The Meghalaya High Court, in M Kharkongor vs. State of Meghalaya March 30, 2022, addressed allegations of drug trafficking using Army vehicles.

TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email