38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

MP High Court Grants Police Protection to Couple Facing Honour Killing Threats over Marriage [Read Order]

By Saket Sourav      23 May, 2024 03:45 PM      0 Comments
MP High Court Grants Police Protection to Couple Facing Honour Killing Threats over Marriage

Madhya Pradesh: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has recently granted police protection to a couple who performed marriage without the consent of their parents and have received death threats from them.

The court also referred to Shakti Vahini vs. State of M.P., wherein the apex court took the matter of "Khap Panchayat" as well as "Honour Killing" very seriously and issued certain preventive, remedial, and punitive measures for state governments. The court held that if the petitioners receive any threat or fear for their life from their parents or anyone in the future, they may approach the Superintendent of Police, Gwalior along with their documents relating to age proof and marriage, record their statement, and inform the name of the person who is threatening them.

Additionally, the court also held that if the petitioners cannot approach the Superintendent of Police, Gwalior due to some reason and in case of emergency, they are permitted to approach the nearest police station to record their statements.

If the petitioners are major and entered into the marriage voluntarily, then they should not be harassed by anyone just because they have an objection to their marriage. In the future, if the petitioners receive any threat or fear for their life from anyone, in order to avoid any harassment, the petitioners are certainly entitled to police protection, the court held while granting police protection to the couple.

While dealing with the present issue, the court also referred to Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. & Another, wherein the Apex Court observed, "This is a free and democratic country and once a person becomes a major, he or she likes. If the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage, the maximum they can do is cut off social relations with the son or daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administrative/police authorities throughout the country ensure that if any boy or girl who is major is harassed by anyone or subjected to threats or acts of violence, anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings against such a person and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law."

In conclusion, the court, while disposing of the writ petition filed by the couple, held that if the Superintendent of Police/SHO finds that there is a threat to the life of the petitioners, he shall immediately take action per the direction given by the Apex Court in the case of Shakti Vahini.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered filing of complaint against petitioner for submitting fabricated documents Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered filing of complaint against petitioner for submitting fabricated documents

The Court pointed out one medical document in particular, wherein there was mentioning of labour pains and contradicted that since petitioner is a male, it makes no sense. In view of the above, the Court opined that the Petitioner unabashedly filed fake documents with utter disdain and disregard for the Court.

Glorification of Women versus Belligerent Female Foeticide in India Glorification of Women versus Belligerent Female Foeticide in India

In Voluntary Health Assn. of Punjab v. Union of India, (2013) 4 SCC 1, the Supreme Court in its watershed judgment on female foeticidedecided it to be the most aggravated form of dehumanization of the human race. The court was observed to have stated that the"Law prohibits it; Scriptures forbid it; philosophy condemns it; ethics deprecate it; morality decries it, and social science abhors it. Its time the executive pulled up its socks and tightened the noose around implementation of the PC & PNDT Act. The duality around women with exhalation of deities and contrasting blatant disregard for their basic human rights needs to break the confounds of mere academic debate and reinforce the tenets on which the Constitution of India rests.

High Court Prohibits Compulsion of Hijab and Islamic Texts on Students of Different Faiths at Ganga Jamuna School [Watch Video] High Court Prohibits Compulsion of Hijab and Islamic Texts on Students of Different Faiths at Ganga Jamuna School [Watch Video]

Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision regarding Ganga Jamuna School: Principal and teacher prohibited from enforcing 'hijab' on students of Hindu and Jain faiths. Learn about the court's directives and the case details.

Supreme Court allows Jr. Judge appointment to woman denied the same due to dog bite case Supreme Court allows Jr. Judge appointment to woman denied the same due to dog bite case

The Supreme Court of India overturns Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision, ordering the appointment of a woman who was previously denied the position of Civil Judge (Junior Division) due to a past minor offence related to a dog bite case. The Court emphasizes fairness and justice in its landmark ruling.

TRENDING NEWS

allahabad-hc-condemns-police-for-taking-woman-into-possession-despite-stay-orders-immediate-release
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Condemns Police for Taking Woman Into ‘Possession’ Despite Stay; Orders Immediate Release [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court slammed Muzaffarnagar Police for violating a stay order, declaring the detenue a major and ordering her immediate release.

02 December, 2025 09:27 PM
rera-orders-cannot-be-executed-through-civil-court-execution-petitions-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
RERA Orders Cannot Be Executed Through Civil Court Execution Petitions: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court rules RERA orders cannot be executed through civil courts, holding that such orders are not decrees under the CPC.

02 December, 2025 10:19 PM

TOP STORIES

forklifts-and-cranes-used-inside-factory-are-motor-vehicles-registration-and-tax-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Forklifts And Cranes Used Inside Factory Are ‘Motor Vehicles’; Registration & Tax Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that forklifts and cranes used inside factories are ‘motor vehicles’, requiring mandatory registration and tax under motor vehicle laws.

27 November, 2025 10:29 AM
loading-of-mineral-constitutes-transportation-us-21-4-of-the-mmdra-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Loading of Mineral Constitutes ‘Transportation’ U/S 21(4) Of The MMDRA: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC rules that loading minerals into a vehicle amounts to transportation under Section 21(4) of the MMDRA, upholding seizure for illegal mineral movement.

27 November, 2025 10:43 AM
sc-upholds-himachal-pradeshs-cancellation-of-tender-loi-sets-aside-high-court-order
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Himachal Pradesh’s Cancellation of Tender LoI, Sets Aside High Court Order [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds Himachal Pradesh’s cancellation of a PDS tender LoI, ruling it created no enforceable rights and overturning the High Court order.

27 November, 2025 10:57 AM
chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-pg-medical-admission-rules-for-violating-article-14-rejects-institutional-domicile-preference-upholds-merit
Trending Judiciary
Chhattisgarh HC Quashes PG Medical Admission Rules for Violating Article 14, Rejects Institutional/Domicile Preference, Upholds Merit [Read Order]

Chhattisgarh High Court quashes PG medical admission rules, holding institutional and domicile-based preferences unconstitutional and affirming merit.

27 November, 2025 11:16 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email