38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Mumbai train blasts case: Maha govt moves SC against Bombay HC's acquittals of 12 convicts

By Jhanak Sharma      22 July, 2025 03:15 PM      0 Comments
Mumbai train blasts case Maha govt moves SC against Bombay HCs acquittals of 12 convicts

NEW DELHI: The Maharashtra government on Tuesday approached the Supreme Court, challenging the Bombay High Court's judgment of July 21, which acquitted all the 12 convicts in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta mentioned the matter on Tuesday before a bench led by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai for urgent listing and hearing the appeal.

The bench agreed to list the matter on Thursday.

Mehta said that the special keave petition is ready.

"Please list it tomorrow. There is urgency," he submitted.

The CJI said that he had read in the papers that eight accused have already been released from prison following the High Court's judgment.

The Bombay High Court on Monday acquitted all 12 accused in the 2006 train blast case as it set aside the special MCOCA court's order handing death sentence to five and life term to seven accused, saying it was "hard to believe" they committed the crime.

The judgment came as a big embarassment to Maharashtra's Anti-Terrorist Squad, which investigated the case.

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and ATS said the state would challenge the Bombay high court's order in the Supreme Court.

The HC had found holes in the police investigation and raised doubts about the confessional statements of accused and testimony of witnesses

On July 11, 2006, seven bombs ripped through Mumbai's local trains killing 189 and maiming 820 travellers. The bombs were timed to go off during the evening rush to inflict maximum pain.

In the order, a bench of Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak cited several reasons for overturning the 2015 verdict of the special court. The bench noted that the evidence was not properly collected and presented. The first arrest was made on July 20, 2006 followed by continuous arrests. However, the test identification parade was not done for four months.

The court also noted some witnesses were also the witnesses in the 2002 Ghatkopar bomb blast case and their testimonies were shattered in cross examinations.

The HC directed for release of appellants from jail if they are not required to be detained in any other case by giving a bond of Rs 25,000 each.

The MCOCA court had sentenced Kamal Ansari (now dead), Mohammad Faisal Shaikh, Ehte-sham Siddiqui, Naveed Hussain Khan, and Asif Khan to death.

Tanveer Ahmed Ibrahim Ansari, Mohammed Majid Shafi, Shaikh Mohammed, Mohammed Sajid Margub Ansari, Muzammil Ataur Rahman Shaikh, Suhail Mehmood Shaikh, and Zameer Ahmed Shaikh were handed life term.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email