38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Naidu's family members threatening witnesses,' AP govt asks SC to cancel his bail

By Jhanak Sharma      26 February, 2024 06:41 PM      0 Comments
Naidus family members threatening witnesses AP govt asks SC to cancel his bail

NEW DELHI: The Andhra Pradesh government on Monday asked the Supreme Court to cancel bail granted to former Chief Minister and TDP N Chandrababu Naidu as his family members threatened the officers who deposed against him.

"There is very serious and disturbing development," senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi claimed before a bench of Justices Bela M Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal.

He alleged the family members publicly said once their party came to power, they would take action against the officers.

Also Read -  SC delivers split judgment on Chandrababu Naidus plea

The bench, for its part, asked if the allegations were on record and it would not hear anything if is not on record.

On this, Rohatgi said an application has been filed in this regard.

The bench then asked Naidu's lawyers senior advocates Harish Salve and Sidharth Luthra to file their response to the allegations.

The court posted the matter for consideration on March 19.

In his submission, Rohatgi, representing the state government contended that this is very very serious matter as the officers who participated in the investigation and made statements, have been threatened.

The family members have made public statements that they have noted the names of the officers, the counsel alleged.

Naidu's counsel Luthra contended these allegations were not part of records.

The bench also said, "We will not hear anything which is not part of record."

Rohatgi said an application has been filed in this regard.

Also Read - Supreme Court relaxes bail conditions of ex CM on AP govt plea against bail in skill development case

He said the benefits of the bail cannot accrue to a party who made such a threatening statements just before the elections.

As the counsel for Naidu said they would like to file reply, the bench deferred the matter for consideration next month.

On January 16, 2024, a two-judge bench of this court had differed on the issue of obtaining prior sanction before initiating inquiry, enquiry or investigation against public servants under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court, however, had rejected Naidu's plea to declare lodging of the FIR, his arrest and remand as illegal in the FIR registered in connection with Rs 3,300 Cr scam in setting up skill development centres.

Naidu was granted regular bail in the case in November, 2023.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email