38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

NCLAT upholds Adani Ports takeover of Dighi Port [READ ORDER]

By Ghazal Bhootra      30 July, 2020 11:38 AM      0 Comments
NCLAT Adani Port Dighi Port

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has backed Adani Ports & Special Economic Zones (subsidiary of Adani Group) strategies to take over the Dighi Port which is currently burdened by heavy debts.

An NCLAT bench consisting of three judges dismissed the petition filed by Vishal Vijay Kalantri, a promoter, who sought to go against the notice passed by the Mumbai bench of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), that allowed Adani Ports & Special Economic Zones (APSEZ) Rs 650-crore resolution plan on March 5, 2020

The appellate tribunal denied Kalantri's arguments stating that NCLT failed to take into consideration the oppositions raised by it following APSEZs resolution plan and denied the settlement proposal provided by his organization Balaji Infra Projects Ltd (BIPL). 

"All objections raised qua the action of the 'Resolution Professional' during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), approval of 'Resolution Plan' of 'APSEZ' by the Committee of Creditors and its subsequent approval by the Adjudicating Authority being unfounded are hereby repelled.

"There is no merit in this appeal and the same is dismissed," observed the NCLAT bench led by Acting Chairperson Justice B L Bhat. The tribunal further noted that all "possible endeavors are made by the promoters to frustrate the CIRP and thwart all attempts at resolution of the corporate insolvency and revival of Dighi Port, thereby jeopardizing the legitimate interests of all stakeholders and defeating the object of the legislation. 

"At the very outset, we may observe that the instant case is yet another instance of the promoters not letting the goose escape from their dragnet, though it no more lays golden eggs," noted NCLAT. 

Furthermore, it observed, We say so as in the instant case this is the third attempt to stall the process, the earlier two efforts on the part of promoters having fizzled out.

The NCLAT noted that all procedures were taken into consideration while allowing APSEZ's resolution plan. 

"It is not disputed that the fair value and liquidation value was determined by the duly appointed registered valuers and the approved resolution plan was considered with regard to its viability and feasibility in terms of the provisions of the I&B Code' and CIRP Regulations. Nothing has been brought to our notice to demonstrate that the approved resolution plan of APSEZ' contravenes any provisions of law, it noted in the July 24, 2020 order. 

This argument, in the nature of such settlement offer being superior to the approved Resolution Plan of 'APSEZ' in the context of a financial matrix, viability, and feasibility, cannot be accepted for the simple reason that the decision regarding feasibility and viability of a Resolution Plan qua the intended objective of I&B Code' is essentially a business decision resting upon commercial wisdom of the CoC and is not amenable to judicial review, NCLAT said. 

Dighi Port, in development by BIPL and promoted by Kalantri, is in a debt of over Rs 3,000 crore and undergoing corporate insolvency resolution process.

Kalantri had offered Rs 680 crore to the lenders, through BIPL, other than the Rs 50 crore towards the CIRP costs and payment to operational creditors. The offer was tabled in September 2019. 

APSEZs plan was allowed by the Committee of Creditors with a high majority, over 99.68 percent votes, on September 19, 2019. 

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-cancels-anticipatory-bail-in-scst-atrocities-case-says-police-reconciliation-cannot-bar-fir-for-criminal-acts
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Atrocities Case, Says Police Reconciliation Cannot Bar FIR for Criminal Acts [Read Order]

Supreme Court cancels anticipatory bail in SC/ST Act case, holding that police attempts at reconciliation cannot prevent registration of FIR for criminal acts.

16 March, 2026 02:44 PM
telangana-hc-sets-aside-dna-test-order-in-matrimonial-dispute-rules-child-cannot-be-used-as-pawn-to-prove-adultery
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC Sets Aside DNA Test Order in Matrimonial Dispute; Rules Child Cannot Be Used as Pawn to Prove Adultery [Read Order]

Telangana High Court sets aside DNA test order in matrimonial dispute, holding a child cannot be used as a pawn to prove adultery against the mother.

16 March, 2026 05:35 PM

TOP STORIES

itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email