38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

NEET PG: SC asks Centre to explain if even meritorious are treated as reserved category candidates

By LawStreet News Network      15 November, 2022 10:57 PM      0 Comments
NEET PG: SC asks Centre to explain if even meritorious are treated as reserved category candidates

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Union government to file an affidavit to a plea alleging reserved category candidates who secured general category marks in NEET PG 2022 are still being treated as reserved category in all India quota seats.

A bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud asked Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati to file the response within three days even as she contended the reservation policy on roaster basis was being followed in the counselling process.

The top court put the plea argued by advocate Prashant Bhushan for consideration on Monday.

The bench, also comprising Justices Hima Kohli and J B Pardiwala, recorded the submission by Bhushan that during the ongoing counselling in NEET-PG seats in AIQ, candidates belonging to reserved category, who are sufficiently high on merit to secure a seat against the general category, are yet treated as candidate for seat in reserved category.

Bhati submitted that allocation of seats for NEET-PG Counselling for AIQ is being carried out as per para 3.1 and 3.2 of the Admission Brochure.

However, an affidavit on behalf of the Union government would be necessary, the bench said.

Bhushan also cited an example of the OBC candidate who secured 73 rank, securing his place in general category but he was kept in the reserved category, affecting the prospect of another candidate from the reserved category.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email