New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

NEET UG 2026 Paper Leak: Supreme Court Seeks Comprehensive Plan to Overhaul NTA

By Samriddhi Ojha      30 May, 2026 01:08 PM      0 Comments
NEET UG 2026 Paper Leak Supreme Court Seeks Comprehensive Plan to Overhaul NTA

The Supreme Court on May 29, 2026 directed the Ministry of Human Resource Development to file a comprehensive affidavit on how to conduct annual national examinations and strengthen the National Testing Agency (NTA), including by adding domain experts, while hearing a batch of petitions arising from the leak of question papers of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test Undergraduate 2026 (NEET UG 2026).

A Bench of Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe said that issues affecting the conduct of NEET would persist unless individual accountability was fixed, and called the situation sensitive.

“The real problem won’t stop till actual accountability arises. Not in terms of so and so will be liable, it will be effective when we know which individual shoulders the responsibility lies. Unless you identify the duty holders it will be a diffused obligation,” the Bench said.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Union government, informed the Court that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was personally supervising the situation. “The Hon’ble Prime Minister is personally supervising this,” he said.

Background

NEET UG 2026, the pre-medical entrance examination for candidates seeking admission to government and private medical colleges in India, was held on May 3, 2026. The Union government and the NTA subsequently cancelled the examination following allegations of a paper leak. A Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the allegations has been ordered.

NEET was similarly plagued by allegations of paper leak in 2024. On that occasion, the NTA had not ordered a re-examination on the ground that the leak was limited to Hazaribagh and Patna. Petitions were filed before the Supreme Court, which accepted the NTA’s stand and declined to direct re-examination, but issued directions to strengthen the NEET examination framework. It had directed the NTA to avoid “flip flops” with respect to the safety of strongrooms where question papers are kept and the grant of compensatory marks. It had also directed a seven-member committee formed by the Central government to examine and address the issues arising from the 2024 leak.

Court’s Observations on Accountability and Institutional Reform

The Court called the paper leak incident traumatic and emphasised that the country must not disappoint students and their families.

“It is very traumatic if this is happening. We cannot disappoint our students. It is not merely the student, it’s the family too… It is so much of emotions, love, time, years of study. It is not beyond us,” the Bench remarked.

The Court observed that the central problem with India’s institutions was ad-hocism, and that institutional knowledge must be embedded in the body rather than in individuals.

“The knowledge doesn’t percolate. It is not the individual who has the capability. It is the institution,” the Bench said.

The Court directed that an affidavit be filed by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, rather than the Union Ministry of Health, setting out a plan for conducting the annual examinations and improving the NTA’s human resource by adding domain experts. It called for a full-time expert body within the NTA. The matter has been listed for further consideration in July 2026.

“The endeavor is to ensure that NTA would have the wherewithal, physical and intellectual, to ensure that no incident such as 2024/2026 examination occur,” the Bench said.

High-Powered Committee’s Report

The Court had on May 25, 2026 directed the NTA to file an affidavit regarding the monitoring committee constituted following the 2024 leak, and had also directed K. Radhakrishnan, the committee’s chairman, to file an affidavit about steps taken to ensure compliance with its directions.

At the hearing on May 29, the Court questioned Radhakrishnan about progress since the constitution of the high-powered committee (HPC). Radhakrishnan informed the Court that 60 suggestions had been made, most of which had been implemented, and that the 2025 NEET UG had been conducted satisfactorily, with only isolated power failures at some centres. He added that there was now involvement of all state governments and district administrations to ensure secure examinations.

The Court questioned whether the latest paper leak indicated a gap in the HPC’s recommendations or in their monitoring.

“Despite your monitoring on the basis of HPC recommendation, if this incident has happened, then there would be a problem with the recommendation. Or the monitoring may not have happened,” the Bench remarked.

Solicitor General Mehta told the Court that new security mechanisms had been put in place for the re-examination scheduled on June 21, 2026, but declined to disclose their details in open court on the ground that doing so could defeat their purpose.

Petitions Before the Court

A batch of petitions has been filed before the Supreme Court arising from the NEET UG 2026 paper leak. One petition was filed by the Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) through Advocate Tanvi Dubey, seeking replacement or restructuring of the NTA. It has asked the Supreme Court to direct re-conduct of NEET UG 2026 under the supervision of a judicially appointed committee headed by a retired Supreme Court judge, and has sought reforms including digital locking of question papers, transition to a Computer-Based Test (CBT) model and publication of centre-wise results to detect anomalies.

Another petition was filed by the United Doctors Front through Advocates Ritu Reniwal and Charu Mathur, attacking the legal structure of the NTA itself and seeking its dissolution in its present form.

A separate petition filed by Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Sudhakar Singh, social activist Anubhav Garg, Indian Medical Association national spokesperson Dhruv Chauhan and political leader Harisharan Devgan has sought the immediate transition of NEET UG to a Computer-Based Test format, including for the re-examination scheduled on June 21, 2026.

Case Details

  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Bench: Justice P.S. Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe
  • Date of Hearing: May 29, 2026
  • Next Date: matter listed for July 2026

Appearances: 

  • For Union of India / NTA: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta
  • For FAIMA: Advocate Tanvi Dubey
  • For United Doctors Front: Advocates Ritu Reniwal and Charu Mathur
  • For Sudhakar Singh and others: not specified in source
     


Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

right-to-trauma-care-is-an-integral-part-of-the-right-to-life-under-article-21-sc
Trending Judiciary
Right To Trauma Care Is An Integral Part Of The Right To Life Under Article 21: SC

Supreme Court holds trauma care is part of the right to life under Article 21, directs States and UTs to establish a uniform trauma care system.

29 May, 2026 01:10 PM
illicit-affair-alone-cannot-constitute-abetment-of-suicide-sc
Trending Judiciary
Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Constitute Abetment Of Suicide: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that an illicit affair alone cannot constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC without proof of instigation or mens rea.

29 May, 2026 03:00 PM

TOP STORIES

can-a-testator-legally-disinherit-his-wife-and-children-in-favour-of-a-sibling-sc-answers
Trending Judiciary
Can A Testator Legally Disinherit His Wife And Children In Favour Of A Sibling ? SC Answers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that excluding a wife and children from a Will in favour of a sibling is not by itself a suspicious circumstance.

25 May, 2026 01:07 PM
petition-filed-in-supreme-court-seeks-cbi-probe-into-fake-law-degrees-and-the-cockroach-janta-party-campaign
Trending Judiciary
Petition Filed in Supreme Court Seeks CBI Probe into Fake Law Degrees and the ‘Cockroach Janta Party’ Campaign

Petition in Supreme Court seeks CBI probe into fake law degrees and the “Cockroach Janta Party” campaign over CJI Surya Kant’s remarks.

25 May, 2026 02:15 PM
jharkhand-hc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-alleged-sexual-assault-of-female-inmate-by-jail-superintendent
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Alleged Sexual Assault of Female Inmate by Jail Superintendent [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court takes suo motu cognisance of alleged sexual assault of female inmate by jail superintendent at Ranchi jail.

25 May, 2026 02:39 PM
delhi-hc-stays-coercive-action-against-indigo-in-rs-458-crore-gst-compensation-dispute
Trending Business
Delhi HC Stays Coercive Action Against IndiGo In Rs. 458 Crore GST Compensation Dispute [Read Order]

Delhi High Court protected IndiGo from coercive action in a Rs. 458 crore GST dispute over compensation received from a foreign engine supplier.

26 May, 2026 01:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email