38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

NIA Act Challenged In SC, Chhattisgarh Government Contends That Act Is Unconstitutional

By LawStreet News Network      15 January, 2020 04:01 PM      0 Comments
NIA Act Challenged In SC, Chhattisgarh Government Contends That Act Is Unconstitutional

The Congress driven Chhattisgarh Government moved the Supreme Court to pronounce the NIA (National Investigation Agency Act, 2008) as unconstitutional today on January 15, 2019.

The Chhattisgarh government is the first state government to challenge the Act. The move comes a day after the Kerala government tested the CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019) under Article 131 of the Constitution of India, 1949. The Chhattisgarh government has filed a unique suit under Article 131 of the Constitution, which accommodates the state to move directly to the Supreme Court in issues of contest against the Centre. 

In the request the state government stated, The plaintiffs (state) submit that the NIA Act is ultra vires to the Constitution and is past authoritative capability of Parliament since the Act enables the respondent (Center) to make an agency for investigation, which, notwithstanding the NIA, is completed by state police, which is a topic of the state under Entry 2, List 2, Schedule 7, of the Constitution

The suit documented through Standing Counsel of the State, Sumer Sodhi said that the NIA Act in its present structure not just removes the intensity of directing investigation by the plaintiffs (state) through police but additionally gives unfettered, discretionary and arbitrary powers on the litigant (Centre). 

Additionally, there are no guidelines administering the activity of forces which gives sufficient prudence to the litigant to practice its capacity at any crossroads without giving any explanation or support to the same, the request said. 

The state government said the provisions of the Act rules out coordination and pre-condition of assent in any structure by the Central government from the state government, which unmistakably is against state power as provided under the Constitution. 

Author: Swetalana Rout



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM

TOP STORIES

ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM
sc-rules-illegality-of-search-does-not-invalidate-evidence-seized
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Illegality of Search Does Not Invalidate Evidence Seized [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds illegal search does not bar admissibility of seized evidence if relevant and legally admissible under law.

25 February, 2026 01:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email