38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

No effort made by either party for restitution if conjugal rights; Orissa HC grants divorce in a decade old marital dispute [Read Judgment]

By Saket Sourav      27 March, 2025 01:32 PM      0 Comments
No effort made by either party for restitution if conjugal rights Orissa HC grants divorce in a decade old marital dispute

Orissa: The Orissa High Court at Cuttack has passed a significant judgment dissolving a marriage that had been effectively non-functional for over a decade, granting divorce to the husband on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

A division bench comprising Justice B.P. Routray and Justice Chittaranjan Dash, while hearing the appeal in the case of Bibhu Ranjan Patra vs Suprava Patra, observed that the marriage, solemnized on March 3, 2013, had completely broken down, with the couple living separately since December 21, 2013.

Orissa High Court Grants Divorce Citing Lack of Restitution of Conjugal Rights

The court was hearing an appeal against the judgment dated November 29, 2017, passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court, Dhenkanal, in C.P. No. 25 of 2016, wherein the husband’s prayer for divorce under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act had been refused.

The court noted that the marriage took place on March 3, 2013, and within a few months of the bride’s stay in the matrimonial home, the relationship had become strained. Furthermore, the court observed that both parties had made allegations and counter-allegations against each other. Additionally, it was noted that the marriage was never consummated, and, admittedly, the husband and wife had been living separately since December 21, 2013.

Also Read - Madras High Court directs impleading of alleged adulteres in divorce cases [Read Judgment]

Referring to the Supreme Court’s judgment in K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa, the bench emphasized that when a marriage is beyond repair due to bitterness, courts have consistently viewed irretrievable breakdown as a significant factor warranting the severance of marital ties. The court in this case also held that “A marriage which is dead for all purposes cannot be revived by the Court’s verdict if the parties are not willing.”

Hindu Marriage Act: Court Dissolves Decade-Old Marriage Over Desertion

After examining the case and considering the above judgment, along with Section 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the court dissolved the marriage and observed:

“We are conscious of the fact that many unprecedented events have occurred in the lives of the parties. The parties never resumed cohabitation after December 2013, and for the last 12 years, no effort has been made by either party for restitution of conjugal rights. Given these circumstances, coupled with the mutual allegations embedded in hatred, we find this to be a case of complete marital breakdown for the past decade. As such, we find it appropriate to grant a decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Accordingly, the marriage between the appellant and respondent, solemnized on March 3, 2013, is hereby dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-b) of the Act.

In addition to granting the divorce, the court also directed the husband to pay permanent alimony of Rs. 18 lakhs to the wife within two months by depositing the amount before the Family Court.

Also Read -  Supreme Court invokes Article 142 of Constitution to dissolve marriage, ends 17 legal cases between couple [Read Order]

Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, Advocate, appeared for the petitioner, whereas Mr. S.K. Mishra, Senior Advocate, along with Ms. S. Rout, Advocate, appeared for the respondent.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a law graduate from The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has a keen ...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Passport Renewal Request Can't Be Denied Solely On The Basis Of Pendency of Criminal Cases: Orissa High Court Passport Renewal Request Can't Be Denied Solely On The Basis Of Pendency of Criminal Cases: Orissa High Court

In the above circumstance, this Court permits the petitioner to submit the required affidavit/undertaking giving therein the position involving both the criminal cases and supporting documents establishing the petitioner is on bail at least one week of this judgment to the concerned Passport Authority at Bhubaneswar. In the event of receipt of such affidavit, the Passport Authority at Bhubaneswar shall do well in completing the issue of renewal of passport involving the petitioner within a week thereafter.

Orissa HC awards Rs 10 lakh to father who lost child to stray dog attack [Read Judgment] Orissa HC awards Rs 10 lakh to father who lost child to stray dog attack [Read Judgment]

The Orissa High Court recently directed the Puri Municipal Corporation to pay Rs 10 lakhs as compensation to the father of a child who was killed by street dogs in 2016.

Orissa HC rules in favour of BJDs Lok Sabha MP Anubhav Mohanty in divorce plea [Read Judgment] Orissa HC rules in favour of BJDs Lok Sabha MP Anubhav Mohanty in divorce plea [Read Judgment]

The Orissa High Court recently ruled in favor of BJDs Lok Sabha MP Anubhav Mohanty, granting a decree of divorce due to mental cruelty. This decision came after examining the lack of physical intimacy with his wife Varsha Priyadarshini, and the high court's findings differed from the family court's earlier conclusions. The case involved detailed considerations of both parties' statements and evidence.

Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6] Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [Jan 1 - Jan 6]

A weekly round-up of the top stories from the Supreme Court of India and High Courts across the country summed up in a 3-minute read.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email