No one can interfere in the marriage of two consenting adults: SC

Judiciary Feb 05, 2018 Editor : Shreya Bansal 0 Shares

The Supreme Court today hearing a writ petition filed by NGO Shakti Vahini regarding the offence of honour killings, has said that Where two consenting adults agree to enter into matrimony, no individual rights, group rights or collective rights shall interfere therein or harass the couple.

Also Read - All Insults Not Offence Under SC/ST Act, 1989: Supreme Court

The Bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice A. M. Khanwilkar has reaffirmed that the Khap Panchayats have no right to become conscience keepers of the society.

The Advocate, appearing for the Khap Panchayats had sought to submit The Khap Panchayats encourage intercaste and inter-religion marriages. Because of the skewed sex ratio in Haryana, as many 2.5 million local boys have married in other states. What the Khap Panchayats are opposed to is intra-gotra marriage. Say, I am a Hooda; it is an age old tradition that a Hooda shall not marry another Hooda. They are deemed to descend from a common ancestor and hence, are siblings. Even section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 prohibits marriage between Sapindas, which is calculated as within 5 degrees of relations from the fathers side and 3 degrees on the mothers side. Scientifically also it has been proven that such marriages have a disastrous impact on the genetics of the children.

Also Read - PCO Moves SC Seeking Appointment of Full-Term Chairperson and VC of the National Commission for SC/STs, points out UP Commission has been without a Chairperson for over 10 months

But the Bench refused to change its stand and remarked that we are not concerned with the sapinda or gotra. We are only interested in the decision of two adults to get married. If any issue arises in respect of the marital status or property, the court shall be entitled to decide the same. The children may be legitimate or illegitimate, that may be for determination in a partition suit. Similarly, even the marriage may be null and void. But you keep out of it. No third party shall interfere. We have already made our stand thereon clear in Vikas Yadav v. State of UP.

All Insults Not Offence Under SC/ST Act, 1989: Supreme Court

Judiciary Nov 06, 2020 Richa Shah ( Editor: Ekta Joshi ) 97 Shares

On Thursday (5th November 2020), the Supreme Court said in a judgment that all insults or intimidations to persons belonging to Dalit or tribal communities will not be an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989The court said that an offence is made out under the statute only if the insults or intimidations were made on account of the victim belonging to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe.This was said by a bench of three judges headed by...

Read full post

PCO Moves SC Seeking Appointment of Full-Term Chairperson and VC of the National Commission for SC/STs, points out UP Commission has been without a Chairperson for over 10 months

National Commissions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

Executive Oct 12, 2020 Parul Singhal ( Editor: Ekta Joshi ) 3 Shares

The People’s Charioteer Organization has moved to the Supreme Court seeking appointment of full-term Chairman, Vice-Chairman and other members of the National Commissions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Article 338 of the Constitution. Article 338 and 338A of the Constitution of India guarantees provisions to protect and safeguard the rights of the SC/ST community by contemplating the establishment of the two commissions. The petition has been filed by the...

Read full post