38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Nurses Cannot Be Categorized As 'Medical Practitioners', State Medical Council Has No Jurisdiction To Take Action Against Them: Karnataka HC

By LawStreet News Network      01 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Nurses Cannot Be Categorized As 'Medical Practitioners', State Medical Council Has No Jurisdiction To Take Action Against Them: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court on June 18, 2019, in the case of The Medical Superintendent Kasturba Hospital v. Smt. Fathima Bi has held that the nurses cannot be categorized as medical practitioners practicing medicine and the State Medical Council has no jurisdiction to take action against them.

The order was passed by Justice B. Veerappa on a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 2.8.2012 passed by Karnataka Medical Council, Bengaluru.

In this case, the Karnataka Medical Council while hearing a complaint filed by a woman whose child died in the Hospital, concluded that the two nurses of the hospital were negligent. The Medical Council directed the Medical Superintendent of the Kasturba Hospital to take action against them. Aggrieved by the said order the nurses moved the Karnataka High Court.

Before the High Court, it was contended that the nurses are not medical practitioners as contemplated under the provisions of the Karnataka Medical Registration Act, 1961.

Referring to provisions of Karnataka Medical Registration Act, 1961 and Indian Medical Council's Act, 1956, the court said: "In view of the aforesaid provisions, the nurses cannot be categorized as medical practitioners practicing medicine and the Karnataka Medical Council has no jurisdiction to take action against the nurses. If that is so, the impugned direction issued by the 2nd respondent directing 1st petitioner to take action is totally without jurisdiction."

While quashing the order passed by the Medical Council, the court also observed: "Admittedly, petitioners 2 and 3 nurses are not themselves registered by applying to the Registrar giving description of the qualification. Therefore, they are not the medical practitioners and 2nd respondent [Council] has no jurisdiction to initiate any proceedings, question of issuing direction to the 1st petitioner [Medical Superintendent] would not arise. It is for the 1st petitioner to take appropriate action to control all the nurses, to provide good medical service to the patients, who come to the hospital with great expectation and to maintain the medical profession as divine profession."

Read the order below.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

priests-who-have-travelled-abroad-cannot-enter-sanctum-sanctorum-andhra-pradesh-hc-orders-strict-compliance-with-2010-circular
Trending Judiciary
Priests Who Have Travelled Abroad Cannot Enter Sanctum Sanctorum: Andhra Pradesh HC Orders Strict Compliance with 2010 Circular [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court directs strict enforcement of 2010 circular barring priests who travelled abroad from entering sanctum sanctorum.

14 April, 2026 01:25 PM
advocate-challenges-punjab-and-haryana-high-courts-refusal-of-senior-designation-before-supreme-court-alleging-lack-of-transparency
Trending Judiciary
Advocate Challenges Punjab and Haryana High Court’s Refusal of Senior Designation Before Supreme Court, Alleging Lack of Transparency

Supreme Court to hear plea challenging Punjab & Haryana HC’s senior designation process, alleging lack of transparency, fairness, and procedural irregularities.

14 April, 2026 01:39 PM
delhi-hc-hears-arvind-kejriwals-recusal-plea-against-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-in-excise-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Hears Arvind Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea Against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in Excise Policy Case

Delhi HC hears Arvind Kejriwal’s plea seeking recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in excise policy case, alleging apprehension of bias.

14 April, 2026 02:19 PM
delhi-hc-rules-in-favour-of-impressarios-social-restaurant-chain-in-trademark-dispute-orders-removal-of-social-house-mark
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rules in Favour of Impressario’s ‘SOCIAL’ Restaurant Chain in Trademark Dispute, Orders Removal of ‘SOCIAL HOUSE’ Mark [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court orders removal of ‘SOCIAL HOUSE’ trademark for non-use, rules in favour of Impressario in major trademark dispute.

14 April, 2026 02:28 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email