38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Nurses Cannot Be Categorized As 'Medical Practitioners', State Medical Council Has No Jurisdiction To Take Action Against Them: Karnataka HC

By LawStreet News Network      01 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Nurses Cannot Be Categorized As 'Medical Practitioners', State Medical Council Has No Jurisdiction To Take Action Against Them: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court on June 18, 2019, in the case of The Medical Superintendent Kasturba Hospital v. Smt. Fathima Bi has held that the nurses cannot be categorized as medical practitioners practicing medicine and the State Medical Council has no jurisdiction to take action against them.

The order was passed by Justice B. Veerappa on a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 2.8.2012 passed by Karnataka Medical Council, Bengaluru.

In this case, the Karnataka Medical Council while hearing a complaint filed by a woman whose child died in the Hospital, concluded that the two nurses of the hospital were negligent. The Medical Council directed the Medical Superintendent of the Kasturba Hospital to take action against them. Aggrieved by the said order the nurses moved the Karnataka High Court.

Before the High Court, it was contended that the nurses are not medical practitioners as contemplated under the provisions of the Karnataka Medical Registration Act, 1961.

Referring to provisions of Karnataka Medical Registration Act, 1961 and Indian Medical Council's Act, 1956, the court said: "In view of the aforesaid provisions, the nurses cannot be categorized as medical practitioners practicing medicine and the Karnataka Medical Council has no jurisdiction to take action against the nurses. If that is so, the impugned direction issued by the 2nd respondent directing 1st petitioner to take action is totally without jurisdiction."

While quashing the order passed by the Medical Council, the court also observed: "Admittedly, petitioners 2 and 3 nurses are not themselves registered by applying to the Registrar giving description of the qualification. Therefore, they are not the medical practitioners and 2nd respondent [Council] has no jurisdiction to initiate any proceedings, question of issuing direction to the 1st petitioner [Medical Superintendent] would not arise. It is for the 1st petitioner to take appropriate action to control all the nurses, to provide good medical service to the patients, who come to the hospital with great expectation and to maintain the medical profession as divine profession."

Read the order below.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email