New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Parents being Harrased via SMS to pay the fees for the duration of lockdown: Plea alleges Before Allahabad High Court

By Nargis      02 April, 2021 08:38 PM      0 Comments
 Parents being Harrased via SMS to pay the fees for the duration of lockdown: Plea alleges Before Allahabad High Court

Another PIL has been filedwhich challenge the unreasonabily high and arbitary levy of fees by private schools in the state as the Government of Uttar Pradesh Government is still not able to reply to a query put forward by Allahabad High Court regarding the regulation of fees during the lockdown. 

The members of the Parents Association has filed the PIL after the parents as well as children are being harrased by the private schools especially through SMS and Whatsapp messages to pay the fees for the session 2020-2021, at time when the schools were closed and no services were provided due to the nationwide lockdown. 

The Advocates Shashwat Anand and Ankur Azad who have filed the petition on behalf the parents pointed out that the UP Self-finanacial Independent Schools (Fee Registration) Act, which was enacted in 2018 was put into practice to regulate the conduct of Private unaided schools and to put chains on  unreaslnable demands of fees by private institutions. 

Section 8 of the above act deals with the Constitution of " District Fee Regulatory Committee ". In order to deal with the issues like the fee charged by private schoolsand to hear complaints of students, parents, guardians is regulated by the committee. But in Uttar Pradesh no such committee is formed till date. 

Moreover, section 4(3) of the act empowers the state Government to regulate the fees of all the students who are studying in private schools for each acacdemic year for the sake of public interest, in exceptional conditions or situations arising unexpectedly like acts of God, Epidemics etc. This section was added to the act on June 17, 2020 by way of an ordinance. But the state Government has not provided the support to the parents in this time if hardships and distress. 

The plea claims that there is rarely any school in Moradabad District which is not harassing the parents as well as childern for fees, for the months when the lockdown was imposed through out the country. 

The petitioners allege that if the students are not able to pay the fee, the schools are not allowing them to attend the online  classes, nor the childern are alllowed to sit in the examination neither the childern are promoted to the higher standards. Even in some cases the schools are removing the names of such students from the school records. 

The plea states that for the sake of extracting illegal and unreasonably high fee from the children, and from their parents the private schools have not even separately specified the tuition fees and are taking the fees of all the heads as one head. By means of this, the schools are collecting the unreasonabily high and illegal school feesand are voilating the directions of the Government and blatant voilations of the mandate of the 2018 Act, which is not only ollegal, arbitrary and unethical, but also lacking the human qualities of compassion and mercy on part of the private schools. 

Additionally, the petitioners claimed that the whole burdon of finance for the "Online Tuition" has also been put on the parents which includes the cost of technological infrastructure, expenses of Internet, connection, Electricity bills etc.

In the case of  Sulekha and ors v State of UP and ors, earlier this year  this issue assumed importance, when the Cheif Justice led Bench of the High Court has asked the UP Government about the principle it shall follow for the regulation of fees under the UP self- financed Independent schools (Fee Regulation) Act 2018.This case  probably is to be  listed on 29th April 2021.

The issue may be read in the light of the observations made by the apex Court in T. M. A Pai Foundation v State of Karnataka. In this case, it was held that in setting up a reasonable fee structure, the element of unfair profit is not as yet accepted in Indian conditions. 

The fee structure should of that kind which takes into consideration the need to generate funds, which should be used for the improvement and growth of educational institution, the improvement of education in that institution and to provide necessary facilities for the benefit of students. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-approves-three-tier-nationwide-icu-framework-says-india-in-dreadful-position
Trending Judiciary
SC Approves Three-Tier Nationwide ICU Framework; Says India in “Dreadful Position”

Supreme Court approves nationwide three-tier ICU framework, calls India’s healthcare system in a “dreadful position”, and seeks urgent reforms.

21 May, 2026 10:55 AM
sc-pulls-up-sbi-says-banks-harass-small-borrowers-while-being-lenient-with-big-defaulters
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up SBI, Says Banks Harass Small Borrowers While Being Lenient With Big Defaulters [Read Order]

Supreme Court criticised SBI and banks for being lenient with big defaulters while subjecting small borrowers to borderline harassment.

21 May, 2026 11:51 AM

TOP STORIES

senior-citizens-act-must-be-liberally-construed-rajasthan-hc-upholds-eviction-of-son-and-daughter-in-law
Trending Judiciary
Senior Citizens Act Must Be Liberally Construed: Rajasthan HC Upholds Eviction of Son and Daughter-in-Law [Read Judgment]

Rajasthan HC upheld the eviction of a son and daughter-in-law under the Senior Citizens Act, stressing protection and dignity of elderly parents.

16 May, 2026 01:54 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-bail-to-eight-accused-in-ganga-boat-iftar-case
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Bail to Eight Accused in Ganga Boat Iftar Case

Allahabad High Court grants bail to eight accused in the Varanasi Ganga boat iftar case; pleas of remaining accused still pending.

16 May, 2026 02:01 PM
why-the-supreme-courts-sc-st-act-ruling-on-public-view-is-neither-new-nor-regressive
Trending Judiciary
Why The Supreme Court's SC/ST Act Ruling On “Public View” Is Neither New Nor Regressive

Supreme Court’s “public view” ruling under the SC/ST Act applies settled law, not new restrictions, in the Gunjan @ Girija Kumari case.

16 May, 2026 04:08 PM
nia-files-7500-page-chargesheet-in-red-fort-blast-terror-conspiracy-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
NIA Files 7,500-Page Chargesheet In Red Fort Blast Terror Conspiracy Case [Read Press Release]

NIA files 7,500-page chargesheet in Red Fort VBIED blast case, naming 10 accused linked to AQIS and AGuH terror conspiracy.

16 May, 2026 06:02 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email