38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Passed well reasoned order in quasi-judicial capacity,' EC tells SC on allotment of Shiv Sena name, symbol to Shinde group [Read Counter Affidavit]

By LawStreet News Network      16 March, 2023 01:25 AM      0 Comments
'Passed well reasoned order in quasi-judicial capacity,' EC tells SC on allotment of Shiv Sena name, symbol to Shinde group [Read Counter Affidavit]

NEW DELHI: The Election Commission has told the Supreme Court it has passed a "well reasoned" order allotting the name and party symbol of Shiv Sena to Eknath Shinde faction in a quasi-judicial capacity after hearing both the parties.

"Since the impugned order was passed not in an administrative capacity of the Commission but in a quasi- judicial capacity under Paragraph 15 of the Symbols Order, it has no contentions to make on merits of the case," it said.

The poll panel contended the order is a well-reasoned and covered all the issues.

"The Election Commission, thus, has become a functus officio for the present case since it has already discharged its duty to adjudicate the petition filed under Paragraph 15 of the Symbols Order after passing of the order," it said in an affidavit.

On February 22, the top court had refused a plea by Uddhav Thackeray's group to stay the Election Commission's February 17 order recognising Eknath Shinde's faction as Shiv Sena and allotting it 'bow and arrow' symbol.

In response to the notice on the special leave petition, the poll panel said in a catena of cases, the top court have held that where an order passed by a quasi-judicial body is under challenge before an appellate court, such a body need not be arrayed as a party to the appeal.

It also pointed out the Symbols Order has been formulated by the Commission in exercise of its power under Article 324 of the Constitution read with Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

 

[Read Counter Affidavit]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM
pre-deposit-under-sarfaesi-act-must-be-made-before-drat-not-before-bank-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Pre-deposit Under SARFAESI Act Must Be Made Before DRAT, Not Before Bank: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC holds SARFAESI pre-deposit must be made before DRAT, not the bank, and writ petitions are not maintainable when a statutory appellate remedy exists.

09 January, 2026 07:08 PM
auction-authority-cannot-cancel-highest-bid-to-seek-better-price-in-fresh-auction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Auction Authority Cannot Cancel Highest Bid to Seek Better Price in Fresh Auction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules auction authorities cannot cancel a valid highest bid merely to seek higher prices in a fresh auction, calling such action arbitrary and illegal.

09 January, 2026 07:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email