38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Petition Filed in SC Seeking Extension for the Moratorium Period till Dec. 31

By Saransh Awasthi      25 August, 2020 05:35 PM      0 Comments
Petition Filed in SC Seeking Extension forthe Moratorium Period till Dec. 31

A lawyer has moved the Supreme Court seeking directions for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to extend the moratorium period on repayment of term loans till December 31 on account of the economic crisis faced by various sectors amidst the lockdown due to the global coronavirus pandemic.

The 35-pages petition was filed by Advocate Vishal Tiwari pointing out the hardships faced by lawyers and those who are in other service sectors. "Due to the lockdown scenario in the country because of the pandemic, it has become a real struggling issue to pay off the monthly loan installments as there is no constant and secured income of the legal professionals and independent litigators due to the closure of the physical hearing in various Courts of the country including the Supreme Court of India", the petition further stated. He argued that the sectors facing financial crisis are not likely to come out of the same on August 31, which is the current deadline, therefore, the moratorium period shall be further extended till December 31. 

The plea has also sought directions to the Respondents and the Governments to ensure no use of illegal, violent, and harassing methods against the borrowers for recovery of the loan installments. The petition also mentions that, in case of any violation of the above-stated norms, strict actions shall be taken against the perpetrator.

The petitioner also highlighted that, earlier, the RBI had granted some relief including suspension of monthly loan installment for a time period of 3 months vide notification dated March 27, 2020. Another similar notification, dated May 23, 2020, was issued to extend the relief for 3 months till August 31, 2020. 

Further on, the plea stated that due to the closure of the Court in lockdown and without any physical hearing, the lawyers and other court staff have suffered a lot of difficulties meanwhile and that, no relief or any sort of financial aid to the lawyers/service sector has been given by the Government so far.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

telangana-hc-cannot-seek-extension-beyond-45-day-limit-to-file-written-version-in-consumer-cases
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC: Cannot Seek Extension Beyond 45-Day Limit to File Written Version in Consumer Cases [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules written versions in consumer cases cannot be filed beyond the mandatory 45-day limit under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

02 January, 2026 07:13 PM
preventive-detention-cannot-be-used-to-silence-dissenting-voices-of-journalists-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Preventive Detention Cannot Be Used to Silence Dissenting Voices of Journalists: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court warns against misuse of preventive detention to silence journalists, calls it a threat to free speech and liberty.

02 January, 2026 08:04 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-earlier-aravalli-definition-judgment-lists-matter-before-vacation-bench-on-december-29
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Earlier Aravalli Definition Judgment; Lists Matter Before Vacation Bench on December 29

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Aravalli definition issue, lists matter before Vacation Bench on Dec 29, 2025, amid environmental concerns.

28 December, 2025 05:08 PM
bombay-hc-upholds-b-summary-report-dismissing-plea-to-reopen-sexual-assault-case-against-sajjan-jindal
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Upholds B-Summary Report, Dismissing Plea to Reopen Sexual Assault Case Against Sajjan Jindal [Read Order]

Bombay High Court upholds B-summary report, dismisses plea to reopen sexual assault FIR against Sajjan Jindal, citing delay, consent, and lack of merit.

29 December, 2025 05:04 PM
calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email