38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

PIL Challenging Restrictive Conditions On Maternity Leave Of Adoptive Mothers Filed In Supreme Court

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      02 October, 2021 03:24 PM      0 Comments
PIL Challenging Restrictive Conditions On Maternity Leave Of Adoptive Mothers Filed In Supreme Court

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) questioning the constitutional validity of Section 5 (4) of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 was recently filed in the Supreme Court. It challenges the restrictive conditions imposed on maternity leave of adoptive mothers. 

SECTION 5(4) OF THE MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961

This section states that adoptive mothers can be eligible for maternity leave only if the children whom they are adopting are younger than 3 months of age. This kind of regulation is discriminatory for both the biological mothers and adoptive mothers as well as for the children who are being adopted.

AVERMENTS IN THE PETITION 

The plea filed by Hamsaanandini Nanduri states the harms of such condition imposed on the adoptive mothers as well as the loopholes of the Act.

Firstly this kind of a condition would encourage the parents to adopt a newborn child against an older child which is discriminatory towards the other children who are older than the age of 3 months. 

Secondly, the plea contends that the Act does not consist of any provision which talks about maternity leave for a mother who is adopting an orphaned, abandoned or surrendered child above the age of 3 months. 

PRESENT SCENARIO 

The plea is listed before Bench of Justice Abdul Nazeer and Justice Krishna Murari on Friday, 1st October, 2021, in the Supreme Court.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email