38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

PIL Challenging Restrictive Conditions On Maternity Leave Of Adoptive Mothers Filed In Supreme Court

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      02 October, 2021 03:24 PM      0 Comments
PIL Challenging Restrictive Conditions On Maternity Leave Of Adoptive Mothers Filed In Supreme Court

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) questioning the constitutional validity of Section 5 (4) of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 was recently filed in the Supreme Court. It challenges the restrictive conditions imposed on maternity leave of adoptive mothers. 

SECTION 5(4) OF THE MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT, 1961

This section states that adoptive mothers can be eligible for maternity leave only if the children whom they are adopting are younger than 3 months of age. This kind of regulation is discriminatory for both the biological mothers and adoptive mothers as well as for the children who are being adopted.

AVERMENTS IN THE PETITION 

The plea filed by Hamsaanandini Nanduri states the harms of such condition imposed on the adoptive mothers as well as the loopholes of the Act.

Firstly this kind of a condition would encourage the parents to adopt a newborn child against an older child which is discriminatory towards the other children who are older than the age of 3 months. 

Secondly, the plea contends that the Act does not consist of any provision which talks about maternity leave for a mother who is adopting an orphaned, abandoned or surrendered child above the age of 3 months. 

PRESENT SCENARIO 

The plea is listed before Bench of Justice Abdul Nazeer and Justice Krishna Murari on Friday, 1st October, 2021, in the Supreme Court.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-issues-notice-on-ashwini-upadhyays-plea-seeking-biometric-and-facial-recognition-for-voters
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s Plea Seeking Biometric and Facial Recognition for Voters

Supreme Court issues notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s plea seeking biometric and facial recognition of voters to curb electoral malpractices.

13 April, 2026 05:11 PM
gujarat-hc-grants-bail-to-13-year-old-juvenile-says-jj-act-overrides-crpc-in-bail-matters
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Grants Bail to 13-Year-Old Juvenile, Says JJ Act Overrides CrPC in Bail Matters [Read Order]

Gujarat High Court grants bail to 13-year-old, rules JJ Act prevails over CrPC in juvenile bail matters under Section 12.

13 April, 2026 05:19 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-criminal-case-against-paediatric-surgeon-who-removed-undescended-testicle-of-one-and-a-half-year-old
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Criminal Case Against Paediatric Surgeon Who Removed Undescended Testicle of One-and-a-Half-Year-Old [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes 20-year criminal case against paediatric surgeon, holds prosecution over orchidectomy was abuse of process.

07 April, 2026 02:01 PM
allahabad-hc-seeks-explanation-from-mact-officer-over-6-year-delay-in-motor-accident-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Seeks Explanation from MACT Officer Over 6-Year Delay in Motor Accident Compensation [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court seeks explanation from MACT officer for blocking widow’s motor accident compensation for over six years despite Lok Adalat order.

07 April, 2026 02:06 PM
calling-someone-bastard-in-the-heat-of-an-argument-is-not-an-obscene-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ in the Heat of an Argument Is Not an Obscene Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules abusive words like “bastard” aren’t obscene under Section 294 IPC, quashes conviction, distinguishes vulgarity from obscenity.

07 April, 2026 02:10 PM
cheque-bounce-case-not-maintainable-if-part-payments-are-not-disclosed-or-endorsed-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable if Part Payments Are Not Disclosed or Endorsed: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court upholds acquittal in cheque bounce case, ruling undisclosed part payments negate legally enforceable debt under Section 138 NI Act.

07 April, 2026 02:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email