38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

PIL Dismissed by Delhi High Court For Inclusion Of Hand Sanitizers And Masks In The List Of Essential Commodities

By Bakul      17 August, 2020 07:34 PM      0 Comments
PIL Dismissed by Delhi High Court For Inclusion Of Hand Sanitizers And Masks In The List Of Essential Commodities

Gaurav Yadav filed a petition stating that in March 2020, the Centre issued a notification to include hand sanitizers and mask in the list of essential commodities, but this notification was in effect till June 30.

The petitioner also added that there was an apprehension that Traders might increase the price of these two items.

On Thursday, Delhi High Court dismissed the PIL filed for seeking directions to the center to include masks and hand sanitizers in the list of essential commodities. The PIL also seeks to reduce the Goods and Services Tax (GST) applicable to the commodities. 

On the issue of reduction of GST on these two items, the court said it will not interfere in tax matters unless it is shown that the same was patently confiscatory in nature and in the instant matter nothing like that has been shown.

A bench including Justices D N Patek and Prateek Jalan said that the inclusion of essential commodities under the act is a complex decision based on a variety of factors like availability and pricing. If in the opinion of the Government masks and hand sanitizers are easily available, then ether is no need to regulate such commodities.

The court said that the PIL was "without any substance" as it does not show that the masks and hand sanitizers are not easily available or are being sold at exorbitant prices by traders for them to be included in the list of essential commodities. "Which items are to be included under the Essential Commodities Act is a policy decision. This court will be extremely slow in interfering with a policy decision of the Government of India.

The bench also said that it was a conscious policy decision on the part of the Government not to extend the March 2020 notification beyond June 30 and therefore, it was not going to direct the Centre to do so. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-criminal-case-against-paediatric-surgeon-who-removed-undescended-testicle-of-one-and-a-half-year-old
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Criminal Case Against Paediatric Surgeon Who Removed Undescended Testicle of One-and-a-Half-Year-Old [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes 20-year criminal case against paediatric surgeon, holds prosecution over orchidectomy was abuse of process.

07 April, 2026 02:01 PM
allahabad-hc-seeks-explanation-from-mact-officer-over-6-year-delay-in-motor-accident-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Seeks Explanation from MACT Officer Over 6-Year Delay in Motor Accident Compensation [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court seeks explanation from MACT officer for blocking widow’s motor accident compensation for over six years despite Lok Adalat order.

07 April, 2026 02:06 PM
calling-someone-bastard-in-the-heat-of-an-argument-is-not-an-obscene-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ in the Heat of an Argument Is Not an Obscene Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules abusive words like “bastard” aren’t obscene under Section 294 IPC, quashes conviction, distinguishes vulgarity from obscenity.

07 April, 2026 02:10 PM
cheque-bounce-case-not-maintainable-if-part-payments-are-not-disclosed-or-endorsed-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable if Part Payments Are Not Disclosed or Endorsed: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court upholds acquittal in cheque bounce case, ruling undisclosed part payments negate legally enforceable debt under Section 138 NI Act.

07 April, 2026 02:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email