38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Plea Before Supreme Court Seeks Ex Gratia Monetary Compensation of 4 Lakhs for Families of Those Who Succumbed To COVID-19

By Nancy Goyal      18 May, 2021 07:52 PM      0 Comments
Plea Before Supreme Court Seeks Ex Gratia Monetary

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court for directions to the authorities to give ex gratia monetary compensation of Rs 4 lakh to relatives of the individuals who succumbed to Covid-19.

This petition was filed by Advocate Harisha SR on behalf of Advocate Reepak Kansas called attention to the that the central government provided a revised list and rules of help from State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF) and National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) and suggested ex gratia compensation of Rs 4 for each deceased individual to those associated in the relief activities.

Plea added that On March 14, 2021, the Union government pronounced Covid-19 as a national disaster by a warning that it is even more important for the public authority under Section 12 of the Disaster Management Act, to suggest the minimum norms of relief to affected people.

The petition further said that it is the right of relatives to know the" real reason for the death of their family members on any official document" and added" that clinical officials have not been conducting post mortem of the individual who is dying due to Coronavirus.

The plea additionally looked for apex's court intervention and proper directions to the respondent state government to give an official document expressing the reason for the death of the deceased during the Coronavirus pandemic.

The plea also states the monetary help was a constitutional obligation on the state as the right to live with the dignity of the victim and their relatives, were infringed because of the death of the bread worker.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email