38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

PM Security Breach: Supreme Court Orders probe by committee headed by retired SC Judge, Justice Indu Malhotra

By LawStreet News Network      12 January, 2022 11:29 AM      0 Comments
PM Security Breach Supreme Court Justice Indu Malhotra

CJI: We appoint a committee headed by Justice Indu Malhotra, DG NIA, DG Security of Punjab and Reg General of Punjab and Haryana HC

CJI: the terms of reference will be the cause of breach, what are the safeguards required for such safety of the Prime Minister. The committee to submit a report at the earliest

CJI: Punjab and Haryana HC Registrar General to submit all records to Justice Indu Malhotra.

SC appoints Committee led by former apex court judge, J. Indu Malhotra, to probe circumstances which led to PM's convoy being stuck on January 5

SC says there cannot be "one-sided enquiries". A judicially trained mind should probe. A report should  w submitted at the earliest

SC says such sensitive issue relating to security breach of PM cannot be left to one-sided inquiries by the Centre or the State government and stayed the proceedings before the inquiry committees set up by Punjab government and the Centre.

Other members of the SC-appointed inquiry panel headed by Justice Malhotra are - DG of NIA or his nominee not below the rank of IG, DGP of Chandigarh UT,  DGP of Punjab, and Registrar General of Punjab and Haryana HC.

SC asked HC Registrar General to submit all records and documents collected by him on orders of the SC to inquiry panel. SC bench of CJI N V Ramana and Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli requested Justice Malhotra Committee to submit inquiry report as early as possible.

Bench: We appoint inquiry Committee headed by Justice Indu Malhotra as Chairman of the Committee with IG National Investigation Agency, Registrar General of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and ADGP (security) of Punjab in the Committee.

Just received call from no. +19059631429 with threatening message on hearing by Supreme Court on PM security case.

AORs received calls again today. From a canadian number



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email